The Secretary of Commerce shall have charge of the forecasting of weather, the issue of storm warnings, the display of weather and flood signals for the benefit of agriculture, commerce, and navigation, the gauging and reporting of rivers, the maintenance and operation of seacoast telegraph lines and the collection and transmission of marine intelligence for the benefit of commerce and navigation, the reporting of temperature and rain-fall conditions for the cotton interests, the display of frost and cold-wave signals, the distribution of meteorological information in the interests of agriculture and commerce, and the taking of such meteorological observations as may be necessary to establish and record the climatic conditions of the United States, or as are essential for the proper execution of the foregoing duties.
Notes of Decisions
Emiliano Monzon v. United States, 253 F.3d 567 (11th Cir. 2001).
· cites it 2× “§ 313 sets forth the following duties of the Secretary of Commerce: The Secretary of Commerce shall have charge of the forecasting of weather, the issue of storm warnings, the display of weather and flood signals for the benefit of agriculture, commerce, and navigation, the…”
Town of Davis v. West Virginia Power & Transmission Co., 647 F. Supp. 2d 622 (N.D.W. Va. 2007).
“) CVI explains that the grants were made under the statutory authority of the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 313 , “for the specific purposes of environmental conservation and research and education programs conducted by CVI and other governmental, charitable and…”
Bergquist v. United States Nat'l Weather Serv., 849 F. Supp. 1221 (N.D. Ill. 1994).
“” The statutory duty which the plaintiffs seem to be alluding to is federal statute 15 U.S.C. § 313 . The negligent performance of duties embodied in federal statutes and regulations may give rise to a claim under the FTCA, but only if there are analogous duties under local tort…”
Nat'l Weather Serv. Employees Org., Branch 1-18 v. Brown, 18 F.3d 986 (2d Cir. 1994).
“4303 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 313 note) (“WSMA” or “Modernization Act” or “Act”), when it scheduled the transfer of weather forecasting services from urban locations in Boston and New York to locations outside of those cities without the formal certification they claim is…”
City of Harrisburg v. Franklin, 806 F. Supp. 1181 (M.D. Penn. 1992).
“102-567 (to be codified at 15 U.S.C. § 313 note), (“1992 Act”) warrant a reexamination of our earlier decision.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.