15 U.S.C. § 376

Reports to State tobacco tax administrator

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) ContentsAny person who sells, transfers, or ships for profit cigarettes or smokeless tobacco in interstate commerce, whereby such cigarettes or smokeless tobacco are shipped into a State, locality, or Indian country of an Indian tribe taxing the sale or use of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco, or who advertises or offers cigarettes or smokeless tobacco for such a sale, transfer, or shipment, shall—(1) first file with the Attorney General of the United States and with the tobacco tax administrators of the State and place into which such shipment is made or in which such advertisement or offer is disseminated a statement setting forth his name and trade name (if any), and the address of his principal place of business and of any other place of business, as well as telephone numbers for each place of business, a principal electronic mail address, any website addresses, and the name, address, and telephone number of an agent in the State authorized to accept service on behalf of the person;(2) not later than the 10th day of each calendar month, file with the tobacco tax administrator of the State into which such shipment is made, a memorandum or a copy of the invoice covering each and every shipment of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco made during the previous calendar month into such State; the memorandum or invoice in each case to include the name and address of the person to whom the shipment was made, the brand, the quantity thereof, and the name, address, and phone number of the person delivering the shipment to the recipient on behalf of the delivery seller, with all invoice or memoranda information relating to specific customers to be organized by city or town and by zip code; and(3) with respect to each memorandum or invoice filed with a State under paragraph (2), also file copies of the memorandum or invoice with the tobacco tax administrators and chief law enforcement officers of the local governments and Indian tribes operating within the borders of the State that apply their own local or tribal taxes on cigarettes or smokeless tobacco.(b) Presumptive evidence

The fact that any person ships or delivers for shipment any cigarettes or smokeless tobacco shall, if such shipment is into a State in which such person has filed a statement with the tobacco tax administrator under subsection (a)(1) of this section, be presumptive evidence that such cigarettes or smokeless tobacco were sold, or transferred for profit, by such person.

(c) Use of information

A tobacco tax administrator or chief law enforcement officer who receives a memorandum or invoice under paragraph (2) or (3) of subsection (a) shall use the memorandum or invoice solely for the purposes of the enforcement of this chapter and the collection of any taxes owed on related sales of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, and shall keep confidential any personal information in the memorandum or invoice except as required for such purposes.

(Oct. 19, 1949, ch. 699, § 2, 63 Stat. 884; Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 512, title II, § 201(a), 67 Stat. 617; Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 695, § 1, 69 Stat. 627; Pub. L. 111–154, § 2(b), Mar. 31, 2010, 124 Stat. 1090.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2010—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 111–154, § 2(b)(1), (2)(A), inserted heading and, in introductory provisions, substituted “cigarettes or smokeless tobacco” for “cigarettes” wherever appearing, “, transfers, or ships” for “or transfers”, and “, transfer, or shipment” for “or transfer and shipment”, inserted “, locality, or Indian country of an Indian tribe” after “a State”, and struck out “to other than a distributor licensed by or located in such State,” after “use of cigarettes or smokeless tobacco,”.

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 111–154, § 2(b)(2)(B), substituted “with the Attorney General of the United States and with the tobacco tax administrators of the State and place” for “with the tobacco tax administrator of the State” and “, as well as telephone numbers for each place of business, a principal electronic mail address, any website addresses, and the name, address, and telephone number of an agent in the State authorized to accept service on behalf of the person;” for “; and”.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 111–154, § 2(b)(1), (2)(C), substituted “cigarettes or smokeless tobacco” for “cigarettes” and “the quantity thereof, and the name, address, and phone number of the person delivering the shipment to the recipient on behalf of the delivery seller, with all invoice or memoranda information relating to specific customers to be organized by city or town and by zip code; and” for “and the quantity thereof.”

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 111–154, § 2(b)(2)(D), added par. (3).

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 111–154, § 2(b)(1), (3), inserted heading, substituted “cigarettes or smokeless tobacco” for “cigarettes” in two places and “evidence that” for “evidence (1) that”, and struck out “, and (2) that such sale or transfer was to other than a distributor licensed by or located in such State” after “by such person”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 111–154, § 2(b)(4), added subsec. (c).

1955—Act Aug. 9, 1955, designated existing provisions as subsec. (a), inserted provisions requiring filing of a statement of name, trade name, address, and places of business by persons who sell or transfer for profit cigarettes in interstate commerce or by persons who advertise or offer cigarettes for such sale or transfer, and added subsec. (b).

1953—Act Aug. 15, 1953, required that the memorandum or copy of invoice be filed with, rather than forwarded to, the tobacco tax administrator.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2010 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 111–154 effective on the date that is 90 days after March 31, 2010, see section 6 of Pub. L. 111–154, set out as a note under section 375 of this title.

Effective Date of 1955 Amendment

Act Aug. 9, 1955, ch. 695, § 2, 69 Stat. 628, provided that:“(a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the amendments made by this Act [amending this section and former sections 375, 377, and 378 of this title] shall take effect thirty days after the date of its enactment [Aug. 9, 1955].“(b) The provisions of section 2(a) of the Act of October 19, 1949, as amended by this Act [15 U.S.C. 376(a)], insofar as it requires the filing of memoranda or copies of invoices with the appropriate tax administrator for shipments of cigarettes into the District of Columbia, Alaska, Hawaii, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, shall apply in respect of memoranda or copies of invoices covering shipments made during calendar months beginning after the month in which this Act is enacted [August 1955].”

Effective Date of 1953 Amendment

Act Aug. 15, 1953, ch. 512, title II, § 201(b), 67 Stat. 617, provided that: “The amendment made by subsection (a) [amending this section] shall apply only in respect of memoranda or copies of invoices covering shipments made during the calendar month in which this Act is enacted [August 1953] and subsequent calendar months.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 27 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1969–2026 · leading case: City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits. Com, Inc., 541 F.3d 425 (2d Cir. 2008).
City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits. Com, Inc., 541 F.3d 425 (2d Cir. 2008). · cites it 8× “15 U.S.C. § 376 ; see also S.Rep. No. 84-1147 (1955), reprinted in 1955 U.”
State of New York v. Mountain Tobacco Co., 942 F.3d 536 (2d Cir. 2019). · cites it 3× “” 15 U.S.C. § 376 (a). The district court ruled that the transactions at issue did not take place in interstate commerce.”
City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits.Com, Inc., 911 N.E.2d 834 (NY 2009). · cites it 2× “Moreover, a federal law—the Jenkins Act—requires out-of-state cigarette sellers to file monthly reports with New York State’s tobacco tax administrator (see 15 USC § 376 [a] [2]) and subjects violators to criminal penalties for failure to do so (see 15 USC § 377 ).”
Robert Gordon v. Eric Holder, Jr., 721 F.3d 638 (D.C. Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “See 15 U.S.C. § 376 (setting out detailed requirements for the report the seller must submit to the state).”
Grand River Enter. v. Boughton, 988 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2021). · cites it 2× “” 15 U.S.C. § 376 (a). A party regulated thereunder must file with the tobacco tax administrator of the state into which a shipment was made (and to the administrators and law enforcement officers of local governments and Indian tribes that apply their own tobacco taxes) 31 a…”
United States v. Michael E. Smith, 917 F.3d 437 (6th Cir. 2019). “The Jenkins Act, 15 U.S.C. § 376 (a) (2006), required cigarette sellers, like Maddux and Carman, to file a monthly report detailing (among other things) the names and addresses of any customers who had purchased untaxed cigarettes.”
United States v. Paul Edmond Dowling, 739 F.2d 1445 (9th Cir. 1984). · cites it 2× “In doing so, she violated the Jenkins Act, 15 U.S.C. § 376 , 9 by failing to register as a cigarette seller with Florida officials and by failing to furnish copies of certain invoices.”
United States v. Elmer Joseph Howe, Stuart Milton Hazard, William Lloyd Bruce, Steven Ray Courtright, Thomas Lynn Fischer, William Wayne Hockman, 591 F.2d 454 (8th Cir. 1979). · cites it 5× “Defendants were distributing unstamped cigarettes in the Kansas City area; none had ever been licensed as wholesale cigarette distributors by the Missouri Department of Revenue; none had ever filed with the state any statements of the kind required by 15 U.S.C. § 376 (a); none…”
WASH., DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Www. Dirtcheapcig. Com, 260 F. Supp. 2d 1048 (W.D. Wash. 2003). · cites it 3× “15 U.S.C. § 376 (a). Dirtcheap contends that this action should be dismissed because the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over it.”
City of New York v. Gordon, 1 F. Supp. 3d 94 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). · cites it 2× “The PACT Act First, the City alleges that the Gordon Defendants failed to comply with the reporting requirements of the PACT Act, see 15 U.S.C. § 376 (a), as well as the Act’s age verification requirements, see id.”
Ho-Chunk, Inc. v. Sessions, 253 F. Supp. 3d 303 (D.D.C. 2017). “” 15 U.S.C. § 376 (a). The Mountain Tobacco court considered whether sales between Indian entities were conducted in interstate commerce.”
United States v. James D. Melvin, Gregory Allan Conner, Robert Pierce, & Carson Robertyeager, 544 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1977). “These convictions were based on defendants’ use of the mails to ship cigarettes interstate into states imposing a cigarette sales or use tax without complying with the Jenkins Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 376 et seq. 3 The Jenkins Act requires the seller of cigarettes in interstate *770…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.