U.S. Code » Title 15 » Chapter CHAPTER 89— PROFESSIONAL BOXING SAFETY

15 U.S.C. § 6307b

Protection from coercive contracts

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) General rule(1)(A) A contract provision shall be considered to be in restraint of trade, contrary to public policy, and unenforceable against any boxer to the extent that it—(i) is a coercive provision described in subparagraph (B) and is for a period greater than 12 months; or(ii) is a coercive provision described in subparagraph (B) and the other boxer under contract to the promoter came under that contract pursuant to a coercive provision described in subparagraph (B).(B) A coercive provision described in this subparagraph is a contract provision that grants any rights between a boxer and a promoter, or between promoters with respect to a boxer, if the boxer is required to grant such rights, or a boxer’s promoter is required to grant such rights with respect to a boxer to another promoter, as a condition precedent to the boxer’s participation in a professional boxing match against another boxer who is under contract to the promoter.(2) This subsection shall only apply to contracts entered into after May 26, 2000.(3) No subsequent contract provision extending any rights or compensation covered in paragraph (1) shall be enforceable against a boxer if the effective date of the contract containing such provision is earlier than 3 months before the expiration of the relevant time period set forth in paragraph (1).(b) Promotional rights under mandatory bout contracts

No boxing service provider may require a boxer to grant any future promotional rights as a requirement of competing in a professional boxing match that is a mandatory bout under the rules of a sanctioning organization.

(c) Protection from coercive contracts with broadcasters

Subsection (a) of this section applies to any contract between a commercial broadcaster and a boxer, or granting any rights with respect to that boxer, involving a broadcast in or affecting interstate commerce, regardless of the broadcast medium. For the purpose of this subsection, any reference in subsection (a)(1)(B) to “promoter” shall be considered a reference to “commercial broadcaster”.

(Pub. L. 104–272, § 10, as added Pub. L. 106–210, § 4(2), May 26, 2000, 114 Stat. 322.)Editorial NotesPrior Provisions

A prior section 10 of Pub. L. 104–272 was renumbered section 18 and is classified to section 6309 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2001–2001 · leading case: Lewis v. Rahman, 147 F. Supp. 2d 225 (S.D.N.Y. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lewis v. Rahman, 147 F. Supp. 2d 225 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). · cites it 2× “See 15 U.S.C. § 6307b(a)(l)(A)(ii) (stating that a coercive provision is unenforceable when the other boxer under contract is also subject to a coercive provision).”
— 15 U.S.C. § 6307b(a)(l)(A)(ii) — 1 case
Lewis v. Rahman, 147 F. Supp. 2d 225 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “See 15 U.S.C. § 6307b(a)(l)(A)(ii) (stating that a coercive provision is unenforceable when the other boxer under contract is also subject to a coercive provision).”
— 15 U.S.C. § 6307b(a)(l)(B) — 1 case
Lewis v. Rahman, 147 F. Supp. 2d 225 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). “See 15 U.S.C. § 6307b(a)(l)(A)(ii) (stating that a coercive provision is unenforceable when the other boxer under contract is also subject to a coercive provision).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.