15 U.S.C. § 706
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1933–2022 · leading case: Stanley v. Peabody Coal Co., 5 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Ill. 1933).
Stanley v. Peabody Coal Co., 5 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Ill. 1933). “es; section 3 (15 USCA § 703) provides for codes of fair competition; section 4 (15 USCA § 704) provides for agreements and licenses; section 5 (15 USCA § 705) suspends the provisions of the Anti-Trust Laws of the United States while the Recovery Act is in force and effect and…”
Harper v. S. Coal & Coke Co., 73 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1934). “interstate or foreign commerce (section 4 (a, b) of the act, 15 USCA § 704 (a, b); for approved codes, agreements, or licenses, while in effect, being exempt from the provisions of the anti-trust laws of the United States (section 5 of the act, 15 USCA § 705); and for the filing…”
Alabama Power Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 311 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 2002). “13 The Order also becomes the focus of any challenge under the Administrative Procedure Act, 15 U.S.C. § 706 . 14 In short, the as-applied context of this litigation, combined with the recent decisions of the FCC and Supreme Court, eliminate' any threshold concerns that would…”
Acme, Inc. v. Besson, 10 F. Supp. 1 (D.N.J. 1935). “Again, in paragraph (c) of section 6 (15 USCA § 706 (c), we find that: “Upon the request of the.”
United States Small Bus. Admin. v. Alaska Urological Inst., P.C. (D. Alaska 2020). “” Because the Court concludes that the Bankruptcy Exclusion is unlawful under 15 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A), it need not decide the additional question of whether the SBA exceeded its authority under 15 U.”
Friends of Alaska Nat'l Wildlife Refuges v. Bernhardt (D. Alaska 2020). “21 1015 U.S.C. § 706 (2). 22 102Pollinator Stewardship Council v.”
Aark Restaurant Grp. LLC v. United States Small Bus. Admin. (E.D. Pa. 2022). “” 15 U.S.C. § 706 (2). Plaintiffs urge that the Agency “has not and cannot provided any written guidelines or procedures that require it, or even provide it with discretion, to deny loan applications for unrelated companies on these bases.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 706(a) — 1 case
Harper v. S. Coal & Coke Co., 73 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1934). “interstate or foreign commerce (section 4 (a, b) of the act, 15 USCA § 704 (a, b); for approved codes, agreements, or licenses, while in effect, being exempt from the provisions of the anti-trust laws of the United States (section 5 of the act, 15 USCA § 705); and for the filing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.