15 U.S.C. § 707
ENTREPRENEURIAL TRAINING, COUNSELING, AND MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE.
“The Administrator shall take such actions as may be necessary to ensure that small business concerns owned and controlled by eligible veterans have access to programs established under the Small Business Act [15 U.S.C. 631 et seq.] that provide entrepreneurial training, business development assistance, counseling, and management assistance to small business concerns, including, among others, the Small Business Development Center program and the Service Corps of Retired Executives (SCORE) program.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21
cases, 1933–1939 · leading case: United States v. Houde Eng'g Corp., 9 F. Supp. 836 (W.D.N.Y. 1935).
United States v. Houde Eng'g Corp., 9 F. Supp. 836 (W.D.N.Y. 1935). “The petition alleges in substance that the controversy described in the complaint is a controversy between the American Federation of Labor and the Houde Engineering Corporation, as regards their respective rights under section 7 (a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act (15…”
Harper v. S. Coal & Coke Co., 73 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1934). “Immediately following the last-mentioned of the above referred to provisions of the act was the provision (section 7 (a) of the act, 15 USCA § 707 (a) which is set out in appellant’s complaint.”
Stanley v. Peabody Coal Co., 5 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Ill. 1933). “services of the Federal Trade Commission to assist in carrying out the provisions of the act, upon the request of the President; section 7, paragraph (a) (15 US CA § 707 (a), is the portion of the act which plaintiffs contend has been violated and which will hereafter be…”
United States v. Weirton Steel Co., 7 F. Supp. 255 (D. Del. 1934). “ion or in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection; “(3) That no employee and no one seeking employment shall be required as a condition of employment to join any company union or to refrain from joining, organizing,…”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Fire Brick Co., 99 F.2d 89 (6th Cir. 1938). “o see him possibly a dozen times concerning an agreement or contract, and if that was true, we could go out of the door and come back to the office the required number of times; that he had given us his final answer; that his final answer was that they were not entering into any…”
Hary v. United Elec. Coal Co., 8 F. Supp. 655 (E.D. Ill. 1934). “By their bill of complaint plaintiffs set up the provisions of section 7(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act (15 USCA § 707(a) and provisions of the Bituminous Coal Code of Fair Competition promulgated thereunder, and, alleging themselves to be employees and the chosen…”
Progressive Miners of Am. Local Union No. 109 v. Peabody Coal Co., 7 F. Supp. 340 (E.D. Ill. 1934). “ued to them as alleged employees of the defendant Peabody Coal Company by virtue of the provisions of the National Industrial Recovery Act (15 USCA §§ 701-712), hereinafter sometimes referred to as the act, and the Bituminous Coal Code of Fair Competition, promulgated…”
Hart Coal Corp. v. Sparks, 7 F. Supp. 16 (W.D. Ky. 1934). “The declaration of policy contained in section 1 clearly proclaims this, and the penalties provided in the act for violations of its terms and for violation of the codes promulgated under it are carefully restricted to transactions in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce,…”
Titan Metal Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 106 F.2d 254 (3rd Cir. 1939). “Its widespread adoption coincident with the National Industrial Recovery Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 707 (a), subsection 2, above cited, called attention to its possible negation of that essential characteristic, of a bargain mentioned at the beginning of this opinion.”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co., 96 F.2d 948 (7th Cir. 1938). “, 15 U.S.C.A. § 707 (a). Mar. 5, 1935 Meeting between Company and Union.”
United States v. Mills, 7 F. Supp. 547 (D. Maryland 1934). “A so-called general “buyers’ strike” might very well directly and substantially affect prices for gasoline but would hardly be thought to justify congressional regulation under the commerce clause.”
United States v. Gearhart, 7 F. Supp. 712 (D. Colo. 1934). “1, Act of June 16, 1933, section 701, title 15 USCA; section 3 (b), title 15 USCA § 703 (b); section 3 (f), title 15 USCA § 703 (f); the definition of “interstate” and “foreign” commerce in section 7 (d), title 15 USCA § 707 (d), and other language found therein, make it clear…”
— 15 U.S.C. § 707(a) — 3 cases
Harper v. S. Coal & Coke Co., 73 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1934). “Immediately following the last-mentioned of the above referred to provisions of the act was the provision (section 7 (a) of the act, 15 USCA § 707 (a) which is set out in appellant’s complaint.”
United States v. Weirton Steel Co., 7 F. Supp. 255 (D. Del. 1934). “ion or in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection; “(3) That no employee and no one seeking employment shall be required as a condition of employment to join any company union or to refrain from joining, organizing,…”
Hary v. United Elec. Coal Co., 8 F. Supp. 655 (E.D. Ill. 1934). “By their bill of complaint plaintiffs set up the provisions of section 7(a) of the National Industrial Recovery Act (15 USCA § 707(a) and provisions of the Bituminous Coal Code of Fair Competition promulgated thereunder, and, alleging themselves to be employees and the chosen…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.