15 U.S.C. § 709
OUTREACH FOR ELIGIBLE VETERANS.
“The Administrator, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Veterans’ Employment and Training, shall develop and implement a program of comprehensive outreach to assist eligible veterans, which program shall include business training and management assistance, employment and relocation counseling, and dissemination of information on veterans’ benefits and veterans’ entitlements.”
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1933–2025 · leading case: Ryan v. Amazon Petroleum Corp., 71 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1934).
Ryan v. Amazon Petroleum Corp., 71 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1934). “Section 9 (15 USCA § 709 (c) is devoted to oil regulation.”
Cerritos Gun Club v. Hall, 96 F.2d 620 (9th Cir. 1938). “acts prohibited by the regulation are repeated, hundreds and perhaps thousands of times in a season, it is apparent that, if the regulation be invalid, appellants' property values will be destroyed, since they will be harassed by a multiplicity of unwarranted prosecutions for…”
United States v. ALA Schechter Poultry Corp., 76 F.2d 617 (2d Cir. 1935). “" The court held that section 9 (c) of the National Industrial Recovery Act (15 USCA § 709 (c), which authorized the President to prohibit the transportation in interstate and foreign commerce of petroleum and the products thereof produced or withdrawn in excess of state quotas,…”
Amazon Petroleum Corp. v. R.R. Comm'n, 5 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. Tex. 1934). “The President, pursuant to the claim of power granted to him by said section 9 (c), 15 USCA § 709 (e), issued an Executive Order prohibiting the transportation in interstate and foreign commerce of all petroleum and the products thereof produced or withdrawn from storage in…”
La Forest v. Bd. of Commissioners, 92 F.2d 547 (D.C. Cir. 1937). “§ 709 (c) the power to interdict the transportation in interstate and foreign commerce of petroleum produced or withdrawn from storage in excess of amounts permitted by state authority was void because the power sought to be delegated was legislative power, and nowhere in…”
Hunter Co. v. McHugh, 11 So. 2d 495 (La. 1942). “§ 709 (c), authorizing the President to prohibit, under penalty of fine or imprisonment, or both, the transportation in interstate and foreign commerce of petroleum and the products thereof produced or withdrawn from storage in excess of the amount permitted to be produced or…”
Edwards v. United States, 91 F.2d 767 (9th Cir. 1937). “446 , in which the Supreme Court held that section 9(c) of the National Industrial Recovery Act ( 15 U.S.C.A. § 709 (c), which gave the President the power to prohibit the transportation in interstate commerce of "hot oil," was such an invalid delegation of power.”
Sunshine Mining Co. v. Carver, 34 F. Supp. 274 (D. Idaho 1940). “We think that these penalties would attach to each violation, and in this view the plaintiffs were entitled to invoke the equitable jurisdiction to restrain enforcement, if the statute and the executive orders were found to be invalid.”
Sunshine Mining Co. v. Carver, 41 F. Supp. 60 (D. Idaho 1941). “446 , said: ‘The statute provides that any violation of any order of the President issued under section 9(c) ( 15 U.S.C.A. § 709 (c) shall be punishable by fine of not to exceed $1,000 or imprisonment for not to exceed six months, or both.”
Stanley v. Peabody Coal Co., 5 F. Supp. 612 (S.D. Ill. 1933). “services of the Federal Trade Commission to assist in carrying out the provisions of the act, upon the request of the President; section 7, paragraph (a) (15 US CA § 707 (a), is the portion of the act which plaintiffs contend has been violated and which will hereafter be…”
Franklin Tp. in Somerset Cnty., Nj v. Tugwell, 85 F.2d 208 (D.C. Cir. 1936). “§ 709 (c), which provided: "The President is authorized to prohibit the transportation in interstate and foreign commerce of petroleum and the products thereof produced or withdrawn from storage in excess of the amount permitted to be produced or withdrawn from storage by any…”
Butler v. United States, 78 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1935). “* * * Section 9 (c) [15 USCA § 709 (c)] does not state whether or in what circumstances or under what conditions the President is to prohibit the transportation of the amount of petroleum or petroleum products produced in excess of the state’s permission.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 709(e) — 1 case
United States v. Repub. Oil Refining Co., 8 F. Supp. 897 (D.N.J. 1934).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.