15 U.S.C. § 70e

Enforcement

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 15 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Enforcement by Federal Trade Commission

Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this subchapter shall be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission under rules, regulations, and procedure provided for in the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.].

(b) Terms of Federal Trade Commission Act incorporated into this subchapter

The Commission is authorized and directed to prevent any person from violating the provisions of this subchapter in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though all applicable terms and provisions of the Federal Trade Commission Act [15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.] were incorporated into and made a part of this subchapter; and any such person violating the provisions of this subchapter shall be subject to the penalties and entitled to the privileges and immunities provided in said Federal Trade Commission Act, in the same manner, by the same means, and with the same jurisdiction, powers, and duties as though the applicable terms and provisions of the said Federal Trade Commission Act were incorporated into and made a part of this subchapter.

(c) Rules and regulations by Federal Trade Commission

The Commission is authorized and directed to make such rules and regulations, including the establishment of generic names of manufactured fibers, under and in pursuance of the terms of this subchapter as may be necessary and proper for administration and enforcement.

(d) Inspection, analyses, tests, etc.

The Commission is authorized to cause inspections, analyses, tests, and examinations to be made of any product subject to this subchapter.

(Pub. L. 85–897, § 7, Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1721.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

The Federal Trade Commission Act, referred to in subsecs. (a) and (b), is act Sept. 26, 1914, ch. 311, 38 Stat. 717, which is classified generally to subchapter I (§ 41 et seq.) of this chapter. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see section 58 of this title and Tables.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1960–2019 · leading case: United States v. Papercraft Corp., a Pennsylvania Corp., 540 F.2d 131 (3rd Cir. 1976).
United States v. Papercraft Corp., a Pennsylvania Corp., 540 F.2d 131 (3rd Cir. 1976). “, Textile Fiber Products Identification Act, 15 U.S.C. § 70e; Flammable Fabrics Act, 15 U.”
Springs Mills, Inc. v. Ultracashmere House, Ltd., 532 F. Supp. 1203 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). “”); see also 15 U.S.C. § 70e. The court therefore will not examine violations of the Textiles Fiber Products Identification Act.”
Beverly Hills Design Studio (N.Y.) Inc. v. Morris, 126 F.R.D. 33 (S.D.N.Y. 1989). “…registrability of Brooks’ patterns. . Enforcement of the Textile Act is left to the Federal Trade Commission. 15 U.S.C. § 70e.”
Courtaulds (alabama) Inc. v. Kintner, 182 F. Supp. 207 (D.D.C. 1960). · cites it 2× “' The Textile Act, enacted on September 2, 1958, was designed “to protect producers and consumers against mis-branding and false advertising of the fiber content of textile fiber products”; it is said to be “in the tradition of the Wool Labeling Act of 1939, and the Fur Products…”
Damaso v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (M.D. Fla. 2019). “See 15 U.S.C. § 70e(a); McNutt v. Dillards, Inc.”
Opay v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc., 681 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “Under the TFPIA regulations, the FTC provided advance notice to textile companies as to how the government would construe the terms “mail order catalog” and “mail order promotional material.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 70e(a) — 1 case
Damaso v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (M.D. Fla. 2019). “See 15 U.S.C. § 70e(a); McNutt v. Dillards, Inc.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 70e(c) — 2 cases
Courtaulds (alabama) Inc. v. Kintner, 182 F. Supp. 207 (D.D.C. 1960). “' The Textile Act, enacted on September 2, 1958, was designed “to protect producers and consumers against mis-branding and false advertising of the fiber content of textile fiber products”; it is said to be “in the tradition of the Wool Labeling Act of 1939, and the Fur Products…”
Opay v. Experian Info. Solutions, Inc., 681 N.W.2d 394 (Minn. Ct. App. 2004). “Under the TFPIA regulations, the FTC provided advance notice to textile companies as to how the government would construe the terms “mail order catalog” and “mail order promotional material.”
— 15 U.S.C. § 70e(e) — 1 case
Courtaulds (alabama) Inc. v. Kintner, 182 F. Supp. 207 (D.D.C. 1960). “' The Textile Act, enacted on September 2, 1958, was designed “to protect producers and consumers against mis-branding and false advertising of the fiber content of textile fiber products”; it is said to be “in the tradition of the Wool Labeling Act of 1939, and the Fur Products…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.