16 U.S.C. § 2440
Jurisdiction of courts
The district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any case or controversy arising under the provisions of this chapter or of any regulation promulgated under this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2013–2025 · leading case: Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Commissioner New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Litgo New Jersey Inc. v. Commissioner New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (2013)
“) Similarly, 16 U.S.C. § 2440 , concerning the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention, provides: “The district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any case or controversy arising under the provisions of this chapter or of any regulation…”
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Gilbert (2016)
“§ 290k-11(b) (cases challenging an award of an arbitral tribunal under the Convention Establishing the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency); 16 U.S.C. § 2440 (cases arising under the Antarctic Marine Living Resources Convention).”
Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC v. United States (2023)
“§ 1581 (i) and that, even if it did, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the district courts have exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 2440 . Defs.’ Mot. Dismiss (“Defs.”
Southern Cross Seafoods, LLC v. United States (2023)
“§ 1581 (i)(1)(C) or (D) and that, even if plaintiff’s action did so arise, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the district courts have exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 2440 . Defs. Mot. Dismiss at 1, 5-6.”
Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bonta (2025)
“, 16 U.S.C. § 2440 (“The district courts of the United States shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any case or controversy arising under the provisions of this chapter .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.