U.S. Code
»
Title 16
» Chapter CHAPTER 46— PUBLIC UTILITY REGULATORY POLICIES › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— RETAIL REGULATORY POLICIES FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES
16 U.S.C. § 2611
Purposes
The purposes of this chapter are to encourage—(1) conservation of energy supplied by electric utilities;(2) the optimization of the efficiency of use of facilities and resources by electric utilities; and(3) equitable rates to electric consumers.(Pub. L. 95–617, title I, § 101, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3120.)Editorial NotesReferences in TextThis chapter, referred to in text, was in the original “this title”, meaning title I (§ 101 et seq.) of Pub. L. 95–617, Nov. 9, 1978, 92 Stat. 3120, which enacted subchapters I to IV of this chapter and section 6808 of Title 42, The Public Health and Welfare, and amended sections 6802 to 6807 of Title 42. For complete classification of title I to the Code, see Tables.
Notes of Decisions
Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 639 P.2d 442 (Idaho 1981).
· cites it 2× “PURPA, by virtue of its Titles I and III ( 16 U.S.C. § 2611 et seq. ) required that state regulatory authorities undertake a comprehensive review of several policies affecting regulated electric and natural gas utilities.”
North Star Alaska Hous. Corp. v. United States, 30 Fed. Cl. 259 (Fed. Cl. 1993).
“3120 , 16 U.S.C. § 2611 , 2623, 2625 (PURPRA). The purpose of PURPRA is to encourage conservation of electricity, optimize efficiency and yield equitable rates to consumers.”
Cent. Maine Power Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 416 A.2d 1240 (Me. 1980).
“” 16 U.S.C.A. § 2611 (3). Section 2621(d) of PURPA provides a comprehensive body of ratemaking standards embodying the most recent scientific developments in electric ratemaking, as guides for State regulatory authorities.”
Greenwood Prof'l Park v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 487 N.E.2d 472 (Ind. Ct. App. 1986).
“16 U.S.C. § 2611 . 16 U.S.C. § 2623 (b)(1) establishes the standard of prohibiting, with exceptions, the use of master metering in new buildings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.