U.S. Code » Title 16 » Chapter CHAPTER 51— ALASKA NATIONAL INTEREST LANDS CONSERVATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER VI— ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS

16 U.S.C. § 3207

Effect on existing rights; water resources

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 16 CasesGoogle Scholar
Nothing in this Act shall be construed as limiting or restricting the power and authority of the United States or—(1) as affecting in any way any law governing appropriation or use of, or Federal right to, water on lands within the State of Alaska;(2) as expanding or diminishing Federal or State jurisdiction, responsibility, interests, or rights in water resources development or control, or(3) as superseding, modifying, or repealing, except as specifically set forth in this Act, existing laws applicable to the various Federal agencies which are authorized to develop or participate in the development of water resources or to exercise licensing or regulatory functions in relation thereto.(Pub. L. 96–487, title XIII, § 1319, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2486.)Editorial NotesReferences in Text

This Act, referred to in provision preceding par. (1) and par. (3), is Pub. L. 96–487, Dec. 2, 1980, 94 Stat. 2371, known as the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 3101 of this title and Tables.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2013–2017 · leading case: John Sturgeon v. Sue Masica, 872 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
John Sturgeon v. Sue Masica, 872 F.3d 927 (9th Cir. 2017). · cites it 4× “” 16 U.S.C. § 3207 (1), (3). The hovercraft ban is also consistent with Congressional intent.”
Katie John v. Alaska Fish & Wildlife Fed, 720 F.3d 1214 (9th Cir. 2013). “See 16 U.S.C. § 3207 ("Nothing in [ANILCA] shall be construed as limiting or restricting the power and authority of the United States or .”
John Sturgeon v. Sue Masica, 768 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2014). “” 16 U.S.C. § 3207 (emphasis added). 9 . The Secretary of Transportation also submitted a letter to the House Committee "strongly objecting]” to the fact that the bill as drafted "would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to promulgate and enforce boating regulations which…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.