17 U.S.C. § 706
Copies of Copyright Office records
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 1992–2020 · leading case: Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 864 F. Supp. 2d 316 (E.D. Pa. 2012).
Grant Heilman Photography, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 864 F. Supp. 2d 316 (E.D. Pa. 2012). “60 However, plaintiffs have not shown that any criminal charges have been filed against Wiley for violation of 17 U.S.C. § 706 , much less shown that Wiley has been convicted of criminal copyright infringement with respect to plaintiffs’ or any other photographer’s copyrighted…”
Atari Games Corp. & Tengen, Inc. v. Nintendo of Am. Inc. & Nintendo Co., Ltd., 975 F.2d 832 (Fed. Cir. 1992). “Copies obtained from the Copyright Office in violation of the regulations, however, are unauthorized reproductions. Section 201.”
William Darden v. Marybeth Peters, Register of Copyrights, 488 F.3d 277 (4th Cir. 2007). “” 17 U.S.C. § 706 (b); see 17 U.S.C. § 701 (e).”
Gatewood v. Sony Corp. USA (W.D.N.C. 2020). “The other attachments include a two-page “Additional Certificate ( 17 U.S.C. § 706 )” Certificate of Registration Form VA, VAu 462-683 to Norman L.”
Darden v. Peters (4th Cir. 2007). “" 17 U.S.C. § 706 (b); see 17 U.S.C. § 701 (e).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.