18 U.S.C. § 1

SHORT TITLE.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

“This Act [enacting and amending provisions set out as notes under section 3551 of this title] may be cited as the ‘Parole Commission Phaseout Act of 1996’.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 385 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1929–2025 · leading case: Frank v. United States
Frank v. United States (1969) scotus · cites it 16× “In other words, Congress decided that petty offenses may be punished by any combination of penalties authorized by 18 U. S. C. § 1 and 18 U. S. C. § 3651 . Therefore, *151 the maximum penalty authorized in petty offense cases is not simply six months' imprisonment and a $500…”
United States v. James D. Soderna (1996) ca7 · cites it 10× “Thus, in case after case the Supreme Court has determined the seriousness of an offense by considering its maximum authorized penalty in light of Congress’s statutory definition of “petty offense” in 18 U.”
United States v. Ali Ahmed Hamdan and Shirley Ann Bush (1977) ca9 · cites it 11× “The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held that if the accused is an individual, the line of demarcation between serious and petty offenses for purposes of the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial should be drawn in accordance with the standard provided by…”
Carter v. United States (2000) scotus · cites it 4× “As the Third Circuit has recognized, "it seems that the deletion of `feloniously' was a result of Congress' effort to delete references to felonies and misdemeanors from the code, inasmuch as both terms were defined in 18 U. S. C. § 1 ," a statute that has since been repealed.”
International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell (1994) scotus · cites it 2× “does not exceed imprisonment for a period of six months or a fine of not more than $5,000 for an individual and $10,000 for a person other than an individual, or both") (repealed 1984).”
Baldwin v. New York (1970) scotus · cites it 4× “[12] 18 U. S. C. § 1 . [13] Frankfurter & Corcoran, n.”
Cheff v. Schnackenberg (1966) scotus · cites it 4× “" According to 18 U. S. C. § 1 (1964 ed.), "[a]ny misdemeanor, the penalty for which does not exceed imprisonment for a period of six months" is a "petty offense.”
Lockhart v. United States (2016) scotus “2977 , 18 U.S.C. § 1 note. So every indication, in 1998 no less than in 1996, was that all the predicate crimes relate to children alone.”
United States v. Jesus Martin Caicedo-Cuero (2002) ca5 · cites it 2× “” 30 Caicedo explains that § 3559(a) is a recodi-fication of 18 U.S.C. § 1 (1), which, prior to its repeal, provided that “[a]ny offense punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding one year is a felony.”
Muniz v. Hoffman (1975) scotus · cites it 4× “Local 70 insists that where a fine of this magnitude is imposed, a contempt cannot be considered a petty offense within the meaning of 18 U. S. C. § 1 (3), and that its demand for a jury trial was therefore erroneously denied.”
Duncan v. Louisiana (1968) scotus · cites it 2× “[32] 18 U. S. C. § 1 . [33] Indeed, there appear to be only two instances, aside from the Louisiana scheme, in which a State denies jury trial for a crime punishable by imprisonment for longer than six months.”
Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of Louisiana (1988) ca5 · cites it 5× “at 1453, and went on to observe: “In the federal system, petty offenses are defined as those punishable by no more than six months in prison and a $500 fine [citing 18 U.S.C. § 1 ]. In 49 of the 50 states crimes subject to trial without a jury .”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1(3) — 2 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.