18 U.S.C. § 1120
Murder by escaped prisoners
1996—Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–294 substituted “Federal correctional institution” for “Federal prison”.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2000–2025 · leading case: People v. Gladney
People v. Gladney (2010)
“§ 1116 (murder of a foreign official, an official guest, or an internationally protected person); 18 U.S.C. § 1120 (murder by escaped federal prisoners); 18 U.”
United States v. Polizzi (2008)
“national Death or Life while outside the United States 18 U.S.C. § 1120 Murder committed by a person who escaped from a Feder- Death or Life al correctional institute 18 U.”
Patel v. Bureau of Prisons (2015)
“” Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120 , 24 Op. O.L.C. 156 , 158, 2000 WL 34475733 (2000).”
United States v. Hausa (2017)
“§ 1118 (murder by a federal prisoner); 18 U.S.C. § 1120 (murder by escaped prisoners).”
Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120 (2000)
“Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120 C o n g ress has clear constitutional au th o n ty to proscribe killings com m itted by escaped federal inm ates serving life sentences, as provided in 18 U S C §1120, w here the killings facilitate the escape or the av oidance o f recapture.”
STRICKLAND v. SHARP GROSSMONT HOSPITAL (2025)
“§ 1118 (murder by incarcerated federal prisoners); 18 U.S.C. § 1120 (murder by escaped federal prisoners); 18 U.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1120(a) — 1 case
Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120 (2000)
“Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120 C o n g ress has clear constitutional au th o n ty to proscribe killings com m itted by escaped federal inm ates serving life sentences, as provided in 18 U S C §1120, w here the killings facilitate the escape or the av oidance o f recapture.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 1120(b) — 1 case
Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120 (2000)
“Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 1120 C o n g ress has clear constitutional au th o n ty to proscribe killings com m itted by escaped federal inm ates serving life sentences, as provided in 18 U S C §1120, w here the killings facilitate the escape or the av oidance o f recapture.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.