18 U.S.C. § 1502
Resistance to extradition agent
Whoever knowingly and willfully obstructs, resists, or opposes an extradition agent of the United States in the execution of his duties, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: United States v. Bertoli, 854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994).
United States v. Bertoli, 854 F. Supp. 975 (D.N.J. 1994). “23 *998 Count Four of the Redacted Second Superseding Indictment (“Count Four”) charged Bertoli with obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1502 and 1503. Count Four, ¶ 4.”
Sec. Exch. Comm'n v. Monarch Funding Corp., Leo M. Eisenberg, Steven R. Cloyes, & Richard M. Cannistraro, Richard O. Bertoli, 192 F.3d 295 (2d Cir. 1999). “§ 371 , based on his attempts to obstruct the various civil, grand jury and criminal proceedings arising from his alleged fraud, and Count Six accusing him of obstructing - justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1502 and 1503 by moving certain proceeds of his racketeering…”
Davit v. Davit, 366 F. Supp. 2d 641 (N.D. Ill. 2004). “) Davit alleges that, throughout Davit’s divorce proceedings, Judge Equi violated 18 U.S.C. § 1502 , a federal statute that criminalizes resisting an extradition agent of the United States; 18 U.”
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Williams, 766 F. Supp. 358 (W.D. Pa. 1991). “Prior to the hearing held on November 8, 1990, the Government filed a Schofield affidavit wherein it identified the legal bases for the Grand Jury investigation; that is as a result of the distribution of the *365 documents it had probable cause to believe that the following…”
United States v. Troy Sargent, 103 F.4th 820 (D.C. Cir. 2024). “” 18 U.S.C. § 1502 (1988). The other proscribed the same conduct vis-à-vis “a Federal law enforcement agent engaged in the performance of .”
United States v. Steven Pinto, 106 F.4th 750 (8th Cir. 2024). “§ 848(a), (c); Count 6, obstruction of justice, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1502 and 2; and Count 7, conspiracy to launder money, 18 U.”
Connell v. Nogan (D.N.J. 2025). “BACKGROUND In 1983, Petitioner was sentenced to a total term of 25 years of imprisonment for obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1502–03, conspiracy to commit obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.