18 U.S.C. § 1590
Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor
2008—Pub. L. 110–457 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsec. (b).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 115
cases (63 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: Lagayan v. Odeh, 199 F. Supp. 3d 21 (D.D.C. 2016).
Lagayan v. Odeh, 199 F. Supp. 3d 21 (D.D.C. 2016). “§ 1589 , which prohibits providing or acquiring the labor or services of a person by force or threats; (2) 18 U.S.C. § 1590 , which prohibits recruiting, harboring, or transporting a person to provide or obtain such person’s labor or services; and (3) 18 U.”
Paguirigan v. Prompt Nursing Emp't Agency LLC, 286 F. Supp. 3d 430 (E.D.N.Y 2017). “18 U.S.C. § 1590 (a) Additionally, the TVPA extends liability to "any person who knowingly recruits, harbors, transports, provides, or obtains by any means, any person for labor or services in violation of this chapter.”
Adia v. Grandeur Mgmt., Inc., 933 F.3d 89 (2d Cir. 2019). “A person violates 18 U.S.C. § 1590 when he or she "knowingly recruits, harbors, transports, provides, or obtains by any means, any person for labor or services in violation of" the statutes prohibiting, inter alia , forced labor, is guilty of trafficking.”
Aguirre v. Best Care Agency, Inc., 961 F. Supp. 2d 427 (E.D.N.Y 2013). “§ 1589 and § 1595; (2) trafficking with respect to involuntary servitude and forced labor in violation of TVPRA, 18 U.S.C. § 1590 and § 1595; (3) fraudulent inducement; and (4) negligent misrepresentation.”
Ali v. Khan, 336 F. Supp. 3d 901 (E.D. Ill. 2018). “§ 1589 ; and engaged in human trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1590 . ( See Compl. [1], at ¶¶ 38-47.”
Kiwanuka v. Bakilana, 844 F. Supp. 2d 107 (D.C. Cir. 2012). “Kiwanuka in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1590 . In Count III, plaintiff alleges that defendants committed a forced labor violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, 18 U.”
United States v. Kalu, 791 F.3d 1194 (10th Cir. 2015). “§ 2 ; (5) trafficking in forced labor under 18 U.S.C. § 1590 and 18 U.S.C. § 2 ; and (6) money laundering under 18 U.”
Doe v. Siddig, 810 F. Supp. 2d 127 (D.D.C. 2011). “§§ 1584 ,1595; (2) trafficking for purposes of forced labor in violation of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (“TVPA”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1590 , 1595; (3) forced labor in violation of the TVPA, 18 U.”
Winfred Muchira v. Halah Al-Rawaf, 850 F.3d 605 (4th Cir. 2017). “§ 1584 ; (2) trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1590 ; (3) forced labor, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Rita Law, 990 F.3d 1058 (7th Cir. 2021). “19-2345 18 U.S.C. § 1590 (a) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 ; one count of transporting XC for the purpose of prostitution in violation of 18 U.”
Cesar Martinez-Rodriguez v. Curtis Giles, 31 F.4th 1139 (9th Cir. 2022). “Second, Plaintiffs alleged that Defendants violated 18 U.S.C. § 1590 by trafficking them 4 Plaintiffs asserted jurisdiction based solely on the federal-question- jurisdiction statute, see 28 U.”
Lagasan v. Al-Ghasel, 92 F. Supp. 3d 445 (E.D. Va. 2015). “§§ 1584 , 1595; (3) trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor in violation of the TVPA, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1590 , 1595; (4) unlawful conduct with respect to documents in furtherance of trafficking, peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.