18 U.S.C. § 1735
Sexually oriented advertisements
1994—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–322, in concluding provisions, substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $5,000” after “shall be” and for “fined not more than $10,000” after “and shall be”.
Section effective on first day of sixth month which begins after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1971–1989 · leading case: Pent-R-Books, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
Pent-R-Books, Inc. v. United States Postal Service (1971)
“Criminal prosecution for violations of the Goldwater amendment is authorized in 18 U.S.C. §§ 1735 and 1737, which are also part of Pub.”
United States v. Toushin (1989)
“18 U.S.C. § 1735 makes criminal a “willful” violation of 39 U.”
United States v. Germain (1975)
“§ 3010 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 1735 and 1737. In an affidavit submitted in support of the motion, defendants’ counsel states that the above information is necessary in order to ascertain whether the grand jury was advised as to the appropriate standards for obscenity and whether any…”
United States v. Treatman (1975)
“…advertisements, failed to state an offense under 18 U.S. C. § 1461, as obscene advertising is governed exclusively by 18 U.S.C. §§ 1735 , 1737 and 39 U.S.C. §§ 3010 , 3011; 3) That 18 U.S.C. § 1461 , as applied to this case, allows impermissible forum shopping by federal…”
United States v. Treatman (1976)
“See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1735 , 1737. These criminal provisions are not in issue in the instant cases.”
Constitutionality of Legislation Prohibiting the Mailing of Sexually Oriented Advertisements (1984)
“The penalty for violation of this provision under the proposed amendments to 18 U.S.C. § 1735 would be a fine in an amount “not less than $50,000, nor more than $100,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.