18 U.S.C. § 1921
Repealed. Pub. L. 116–260, div. O, title X, § 1002(9), Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 2155]
[repealed]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1983–2014 · leading case: United States v. Mary Louise Seay, A/K/A Mary Louise Derringer
United States v. Mary Louise Seay, A/K/A Mary Louise Derringer (1983)
“18 U.S.C. § 1921 . 2 On the three counts under *1281 § 1001, which are felonies, she was sentenced to two years, suspended on service of six months with five years probation.”
United States v. Thomas Mills, Sr. (2014)
“§ 1621 (conviction for perjury requires proof that defendant took an oath); 18 U.S.C. § 1921 (conviction for receiving federal employees’ compensation after marriage requires proof that defendant married); 18 U.”
National Ass'n of Government Employees, Inc. v. Barrett (1997)
“Background On September 30, 1996, President Clinton signed into law, as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, amendments to the criminal provisions of the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 1921 , et seq. [the Act]. 1 Central Act to this action is the…”
United States v. Pfeifer (2002)
“[¶ 6] On September 30, 1996, the President signed into law* as part of the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, the Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 1921 , et seq. This Amendment makes it “unlawful for any person .”
Davenport Grain Co. v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance (1987)
“” Later in the opinion appears this statement: “We hold that absent explicit statutory or contractual authorization for the taxation of the expenses of a litigant’s witness’s costs, federal courts are bound by the limitations set out in 18 U.S.C. § 1921 and § 1920.” The result…”
Rawlings v. Gilt Edge Flour Mills, Inc. (2010)
“The question of certification will be addressed separately.”
United States v. One (1) Vyatskie Polyany MacHine Building Plant \Molot\" VEPR Rifle" (2007)
“) On November 3, 2004, American Outdoor Sports contacted the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (“NICBCS”) to verify that Walker was not prohibited from possessing or receiving a firearm in violation of the federal Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1921 , et seq.,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.