18 U.S.C. § 1922

False or withheld report concerning Federal employees’ compensation

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever, being an officer or employee of the United States charged with the responsibility for making the reports of the immediate superior specified by section 8120 of title 5, willfully fails, neglects, or refuses to make any of the reports, or knowingly files a false report, or induces, compels, or directs an injured employee to forego filing of any claim for compensation or other benefits provided under subchapter I of chapter 81 of title 5 or any extension or application thereof, or willfully retains any notice, report, claim, or paper which is required to be filed under that subchapter or any extension or application thereof, or regulations prescribed thereunder, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: United States v. Clayton Harris

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

United States v. Clayton Harris (2015) ca6 “Defendant Clayton Harris pleaded guilty to an indictment charging him with being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1922 (g)(1). At the sentencing hearing, the district court calculated the applicable Guidelines range as 37 to 46 months.”

Kimber v. Harker (2024) casd · cites it 6× “; 18 U.S.C. §§ 1922 and 2071; the Fifth Amendment to the U.”

United States v. Daniel Jasen Thrift (2006) ca11 “§ 2423 (b) and (e); and possessing a firearm as a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1922 (g)(1) and (2). Specifically, Thrift argues the district court either erred in applying an upward departure to his sentence or that his non-guideline sentence was unreasonable.”

Kyle v. Brennan (2018) ilnd “Kyle identifies 18 U.S.C. § 1922 as the "true basis for the complaint.”

Teresa Love, et al. v. Rachel Pond, et al. (2025) nvd “§ 1001; 18 U.S.C. § 1922; 5 U.S.C. § 701(a); 5 U.”

United States v. Jacobs (2001) ca5 “Later, Jacobs was charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1922 (g)(1). At trial, he admitted that he was a convicted felon, but he maintained that he never had possession of the pawned gun.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.