U.S. Code » Title 18 » Part PART I— CRIMES › Chapter CHAPTER 101— RECORDS AND REPORTS

18 U.S.C. § 2073

False entries and reports of moneys or securities

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar

Whoever, being an officer, clerk, agent, or other employee of the United States or any of its agencies, charged with the duty of keeping accounts or records of any kind, with intent to deceive, mislead, injure, or defraud, makes in any such account or record any false or fictitious entry or record of any matter relating to or connected with his duties; or

Whoever, being an officer, clerk, agent, or other employee of the United States or any of its agencies, charged with the duty of receiving, holding, or paying over moneys or securities to, for, or on behalf of the United States, or of receiving or holding in trust for any person any moneys or securities, with like intent, makes a false report of such moneys or securities—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1960–2021 · leading case: United States v. Janyce Carter
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Janyce Carter (1983) ca7 · cites it 8× “§ 1711 , and 18 U.S.C. §§ 2073 , 2. We affirm. I. As of April 15, 1982, Janyce Carter had worked for the United States Postal Service for sixteen years.”
Commonwealth v. Fulgiam (2017) mass · cites it 2× “Corbin argues that counsel was ineffective in failing to file a motion to suppress the content of the text messages where the Commonwealth obtained access without a warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 2073 (a) and art. 14. We agree that, on both statutory and constitutional grounds, a…”
United States v. Elyakim G. Rosenblatt (1977) ca2 · cites it 2× “He was also charged with eight counts of falsifying postal records in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073 . After pleading guilty to conspiracy and to one count of making false entries, he testified against the appellant.”
United States v. Patricia Eileen Krapp (1987) ca8 “Krapp appeals her conviction of three counts of making false record entries with intent to mislead, deceive or defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073 . For reversal, Krapp argues that the district court 1 erred: 1) in refusing to grant a mistrial after the…”
United States v. David G. Swaim (1981) ca4 “WIDENER, Circuit Judge: The defendant, the acting station manager and supervisor of the Hilltop Station Post Office in Greensboro, North Carolina, was convicted of five counts of filing false accounts with the United States Postal Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073 . The…”
United States v. Davis (2009) ca5 “PER CURIAM: * Paulette Davis pleaded guilty to making false entries and reports of moneys or securities in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073 . She was sentenced to two years of probation.”
United States v. Delores Lockhart (2006) ca11 “Postal Service (USPS), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073 . On appeal, she first argues that the government did not present sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could have found that she acted with criminal intent, and that at most the evidence demonstrated Lockhart’s…”
Nordbrock v. United States (2000) azd “§ 1964 (RICO); 18 U.S.C. § 2073 (false entries and reports); 26 U.”
United States v. Kaur (2011) ca2 “§ 1711 , and making false entries and reports of moneys, 18 U.S.C. § 2073 . Kaur principally argues that the Government violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1)(E) by failing to adequately disclose a video clip about which the Government elicited testimony during…”
United States v. Daniel (2010) ca2 “§ 1711 , and one count of making false entries and reports of moneys in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073 . On appeal Daniel contends that her convictions must be set aside on account of allegedly inappropriate comments that the District Court made to the jury.”
United States v. Franklin (2007) ca4 · cites it 2× “PER CURIAM: Richard Henry Franklin appeals his conviction for one count of falsification of government records in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2073 (2000). * For the reasons that follow, we affirm.”
United States v. Sharon Ramos (2019) ca7 “18-1683 Page 3 records, 18 U.S.C. § 2073 , two counts of conversion of government money, id.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.