Notes of Decisions
Cited in
984
cases (
168 in the last 5 years), 1975–2026 · leading case:
United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009).
United States v. Gould, 568 F.3d 459 (4th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 38× “and 18 U.S.C. § 2250 ), for failing to register in Maryland as a sex offender when Maryland had not yet implemented SORNA's enhanced registration requirements.”
Carr v. United States, 560 U.S. 438 (2010).
· cites it 18× “Argued February 24, 2010—Decided June 1, 2010 Enacted in 2006, the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) makes it a federal crime for, inter alia, any person (1) who “is required to register under [SORNA],” and (2) who “travels in in terstate or foreign…”
United States v. Anthony Kebodeaux, 687 F.3d 232 (5th Cir. 2012).
· cites it 42× “Kebodeaux argues that § 2250(a)(2)(A) and the registration requirements that it enforces are unconstitutional as applied to him, because they exceed the constitutional powers of the United States.”
United States v. Hatcher, 560 F.3d 222 (4th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 16× “Each of the Appellants was convicted of knowingly failing to register or update their registration as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (a) (2006). The Appellants argue that SORNA is unconstitutional…”
United States v. Cain, 583 F.3d 408 (6th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 18× “The Government indicted defendant Cain under 18 U.S.C. § 2250 for traveling from Ohio to Georgia sometime between October 16, 2006, and March 28, 2007, and failing to update his sex offender registration as required by state and federal law.”
Reynolds v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 975 (2012).
· cites it 11× “” 18 U. S. C. §2250 (a). The Act defines “sex offender” to include offend- ers who were convicted before the Act’s effective date, 42 U.”
United States v. Hester, 589 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2009).
· cites it 23× “), convicting him, following a guilty plea, of two counts of traveling in interstate commerce and failing to register or update his sex offender registration in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (a), and one count of…”
United States v. Nazario Gonzalez-Medina, 757 F.3d 425 (5th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 16× “HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge: Nazario Gonzalez-Medina appeals his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (a). On appeal, Gonzalez-Medina contends that he was not required to register as a sex offender because his Wisconsin conviction…”
United States v. Hinckley, 550 F.3d 926 (10th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 10× “Defendant-Appellant Shawn Lloyd Hinckley appeals from his conviction for failing to register pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), 18 U.S.C. § 2250 , enacted July 27, 2006.”
United States v. Lawrance, 548 F.3d 1329 (10th Cir. 2008).
· cites it 14× “Defendant-Appellant Keith Allen Lawrance appeals from his conviction for failing to register pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act ("SORNA"), 18 U.S.C. § 2250 , enacted July 27, 2006.”
United States v. Ambert, 561 F.3d 1202 (11th Cir. 2009).
· cites it 9× “On September 18, 2007, Ambert was charged in a superseding federal indictment filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida with traveling in interstate commerce to Florida, and failing to register with the State of Florida, under the Sex…”
United States v. Yelloweagle, 643 F.3d 1275 (10th Cir. 2011).
· cites it 13× “*1278 In addition to the requirement that states enact criminal penalties for the failure to register, SORNA contains its own criminal provision, 18 U.S.C. § 2250 (a), which provides that an individual who fails to register under § 16913 is guilty of an independent federal…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a) — 7 cases
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.