34 U.S.C. § 10101

Establishment of Office of Justice Programs

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 34 CasesGoogle Scholar

There is hereby established an Office of Justice Programs within the Department of Justice under the general authority of the Attorney General. The Office of Justice Programs (hereinafter referred to in this chapter as the “Office”) shall be headed by an Assistant Attorney General (hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the “Assistant Attorney General”) appointed by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2018–2025 · leading case: City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Sessions, 349 F. Supp. 3d 924 (N.D. Cal. 2018).
City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Sessions, 349 F. Supp. 3d 924 (N.D. Cal. 2018). “197 (1968), codified as amended at 34 U.S.C. § 10101 , et seq. The same statute created the precursor to the Byrne JAG program; the program's current iteration was established through the Violence Against Women and Department of Justice Reauthorization Act of 2005.”
State v. U.S. Dep't of Just., 343 F. Supp. 3d 213 (S.D. Ill. 2018). “34 U.S.C. § 10101 . The Court need not address whether Defendants' "argument might fail for an additional reason, that the term 'special conditions' is a term of art referring to conditions for high-risk grantees with difficulty adhering to grant requirements" that does not…”
City of Phila. v. Sessions, 309 F. Supp. 3d 271 (E.D. Pa. 2018). “§ 10110 (2), the Attorney General possesses "final authority over all functions, including any grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts made, or entered into, for the Office of Justice Programs," which is headed by an Assistant Attorney General pursuant to 34 U.S.C. § 10101…”
State v. Newman (Del. Super. Ct. 2018). “have reasoned that “proof establishing that [firearms] were antiques within the meaning of [Section 921] would not negative any of the government’s proof.”
United States v. Manlambus (N.M.C.C.A. 2020). “197 (codified at 34 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq.). Pub. L. No. 90-351, Title II, § 7-1(a), 82 Stat.”
Turner v. Baldwin (M.D. Fla. 2019). “Turner also cites 34 U.S.C. § 10101 and 39 U.S.C. § 404 (7).”
The People of the State of New York v. Arm or Ally, LLC (S.D.N.Y. 2022). “Congress passed the GCA to build upon the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“OCCSSA”), 34 U.S.C. § 10101 et seq. (as amended), which Congress enacted only after finding that then-existing “Federal controls” over the “widespread traffic in firearms moving in or…”
Grant v. Anne Arundel Cnty. Police Dept. (D. Maryland 2025). “2 As for relief, Plaintiff seeks monetary compensation, removal of his DNA information from all government databases, and expungement of the rape allegation from investigative records.”
Riaz v. Fahoum CA5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 2000d) and the statute establishing the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs (34 U.S.C. §§ 10101–10112). Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides, “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be…”
Riaz v. Fahoum CA5 (Cal. Ct. App. 2025). “§ 2000d) and the statute establishing the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs (34 U.S.C. §§ 10101–10112). Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides, “No person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.