18 U.S.C. § 2257A
Record keeping requirements for simulated sexual conduct
The 3
The date of enactment of this subsection, referred to in subsec. (f)(4)(A), means the date of enactment of Pub. L. 109–248, which was approved
Final regulations implementing this section, referred to in the undesignated subsec. preceding subsec. (k), were published in the Federal Register on
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2010–2020 · leading case: Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h). The second circumstance is where the Exempted Depictions were: (1) subject to the authority and regulation of the Federal Communications Commission acting in its capacity to regulate the broadcast of obscene, indecent, or profane programming; and (2)…”
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United States (2016)
“§ 2257 , and of “simulated sexually explicit conduct,” 18 U.S.C. § 2257A; see United States v. Playboy Entm’t Grp.”
FREE SPEECH COALITION, INC. v. Holder (2010)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A Added in 2006, § 2257A pertains to depictions of simulated (rather than actual) sexually explicit conduct.”
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United States (2015)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h). These exemptions are intended to apply to industries where Congress believed that existing regulatory schemes already "adequately achieve[d] the same age-verification ends as the Statutes,” such as the mainstream motion picture and television industries.”
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United States (2020)
“Later, Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. § 2257A as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(a) — 1 case
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United States (2020)
“Later, Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. § 2257A as part of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(e)(1) — 1 case
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(e)(2) — 1 case
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(f) — 1 case
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h) — 4 cases
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United States (2016)
“§ 2257 , and of “simulated sexually explicit conduct,” 18 U.S.C. § 2257A; see United States v. Playboy Entm’t Grp.”
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h). The second circumstance is where the Exempted Depictions were: (1) subject to the authority and regulation of the Federal Communications Commission acting in its capacity to regulate the broadcast of obscene, indecent, or profane programming; and (2)…”
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General United States (2015)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h). These exemptions are intended to apply to industries where Congress believed that existing regulatory schemes already "adequately achieve[d] the same age-verification ends as the Statutes,” such as the mainstream motion picture and television industries.”
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h)(1)(A)(i) — 1 case
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h). The second circumstance is where the Exempted Depictions were: (1) subject to the authority and regulation of the Federal Communications Commission acting in its capacity to regulate the broadcast of obscene, indecent, or profane programming; and (2)…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h)(2) — 1 case
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h)(l)(A)(i) — 1 case
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h). The second circumstance is where the Exempted Depictions were: (1) subject to the authority and regulation of the Federal Communications Commission acting in its capacity to regulate the broadcast of obscene, indecent, or profane programming; and (2)…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(i) — 2 cases
Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States (2012)
“18 U.S.C. § 2257A(h). The second circumstance is where the Exempted Depictions were: (1) subject to the authority and regulation of the Federal Communications Commission acting in its capacity to regulate the broadcast of obscene, indecent, or profane programming; and (2)…”
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2257A(i)(1) — 1 case
Free Speech Coal., Inc. v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 2257A, extended the recordkeeping, labeling, and inspection *685 requirements of § 2257 to visual depictions of simulated sexually explicit conduct, defined in regulations as follows: conduct engaged in by performers that is depicted in a manner that would cause a reasonable…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.