Whoever sets fire to any vessel of foreign registry, or any vessel of American registry entitled to engage in commerce with foreign nations, or to any vessel of the United States, or to the cargo of the same, or tampers with the motive power of instrumentalities of navigation of such vessel, or places bombs or explosives in or upon such vessel, or does any other act to or upon such vessel while within the jurisdiction of the United States, or, if such vessel is of American registry, while she is on the high sea, with intent to injure or endanger the safety of the vessel or of her cargo, or of persons on board, whether the injury or danger is so intended to take place within the jurisdiction of the United States, or after the vessel shall have departed therefrom and whoever attempts to do so shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Notes of Decisions
United States v. Callan, 22 F. App'x 434 (6th Cir. 2001).
· cites it 3× “On February 18, 1999, the jury returned a verdict of guilty against Callan for tampering with a vessel of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2275 . Following the verdict, Callan filed a motion for judgment of acquittal based on insufficiency of the evidence and two…”
United States v. Joseph Alfred Tanner, 471 F.2d 128 (7th Cir. 1972).
· cites it 2× “§ 1363), and Count VII which alleged they had knowingly and unlawfully set fire to a vessel of foreign registry within the jurisdiction of the United States (in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2275 ). 1 Tanner and Pearl were sen *132 tenced to five years on Counts I, IV and VII and one…”
United States v. Joseph Bryant, John Cagnina, Terry Lee Alvarez, 671 F.2d 450 (11th Cir. 1982).
“KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge: Appellants Joseph Bryant, John Cagnina, and Terry Lee Alvarez were convicted by a jury of tampering with a vessel of the United States with the intent to injure or en *452 danger the safety of the vessel in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2275 . On appeal they…”
United States v. Orlando Bosch Avila, A/K/A Ernesto, 443 F.2d 792 (5th Cir. 1971).
“§ 371 (1966) by unlawfully and knowingly conspiring with each other to violate 18 U.S.C.A. § 2275 (1970), which precludes knowingly and wilfully causing damage by placing bombs upon or firing at a vessel of foreign registry within the jurisdiction of the United States.”
United States v. Motto Franicevich, 465 F.2d 467 (5th Cir. 1972).
· cites it 3× “, a eoconspirator but not a co-defendant, to violate 18 U.S.C. § 2275 2 “by wilfully and feloniously removing the engines and navigational instruments of a vessel of the United States, with the intent to injure or endanger the safety of said vessel.”
United States v. Bradley, 540 F. Supp. 690 (D. Maryland 1982).
“§ 1992 , and shipping, now codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2275 . Neither of the other statutes contains the “causes” language of 18 U.”
United States v. Callan, 96 F. App'x 299 (6th Cir. 2004).
“In 1999, Brennan James Callan was found guilty by a jury of tampering with a vessel, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2275 . A panel of this court affirmed Callaris conviction and sentence in all respects on direct appeal.”
United States v. Callan, 72 F. App'x 349 (6th Cir. 2003).
· cites it 2× “In 1999, Callan was convicted of tampering with a vessel in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2275 . On June 30, 1999, he was sentenced to thirty months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.