18 U.S.C. § 2323
Forfeiture, destruction, and restitution
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 2010–2020 · leading case: State of Louisiana v. Dominick Sims
State of Louisiana v. Dominick Sims (2016)
“§ 2251 (a), and 18 U.S.C. § 2323 (a) and related cases). 8 forth above, neither the jurisprudence of this Court nor the United States Supreme Court requires scienter as an element of a crime, particularly where the underlying conduct would be illegal even if the strict liability…”
United States v. Real Property & Premises Located at 249-20 Cambria Avenue (2014)
“§ 545 ; and/or (b) 18 U.S.C. § 2323 (a), as property used in any manner or part to commit or facilitate the commission of violations of 18 U.”
United States v. All Assets Listed in Attachment A (2015)
“§ 981 (a)(1)(A) provides for forfeiture of property traceable to violations of 18 U.SU. §§ 1956 and 1957. Section 1956(a)(1) prohibits the use of the proceeds of an unlawful activity where a person knows the illegal nature of the proceeds and conducts or attempts to conduct a…”
United States v. Hamdan (2014)
“See 18 U.S.C. § 2323 (b)(2)(B). But forfeiture and restitution are distinct measures.”
United States v. Real Property & Premises Located at 249-20 Cambria Avenue (2014)
“§ 545 ; and/or (b) 18 U.S.C. § 2323 (a), as property used in any manner or part to commit or facilitate the commission of violations of 18 U.”
United States v. Two (2) Pairs of Nike Air Jordan Sneakers (2020)
“Virgin Islands; (2) the seized Defendant Property was seized “pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2323 (forfeiture of counterfeit goods) for a violation pursuant to 18 U.”
United States v. Wittich (2014)
“18 U.S.C. § 2323 (b) provides for forefeiture.”
United States v. Approximately $7,800.00 in U.S. Currency (2020)
“Plaintiff seeks 18 judgment against the interests of Siep San and Thomas Godwin and also requests that the Court 19 enter a Final Judgment of Forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2323 , forfeiting all right, title, and 20 interest in the defendant currency to Plaintiff to be…”
Doe v. United States (2019)
“§ 2318 (d); 18 U.S.C. §2323 (c); 18 U.S.C. § 2428 ; 18 U.”
United States v. Charles Neuman (2010)
“See 18 U.S.C. §§ 2323 , 3663A (providing that victims are entitled to recover the value of their property that has been stolen).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.