18 U.S.C. § 2332h
Radiological dispersal devices
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: United States v. Brahm, 520 F. Supp. 2d 619 (D.N.J. 2007).
United States v. Brahm, 520 F. Supp. 2d 619 (D.N.J. 2007). “, § 2332a(a)(l)(D) (weapons of mass destruction), and 18 U.S.C. § 2332h(a)(l)(A) (radiological dispersion devices, or “dirty bombs”).”
United States v. Crawford, 714 F. App'x 27 (2d Cir. 2017). “Count One Crawford was convicted under Count One for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2332h, which makes it “unlawful for any person to knowingly produce, construct, otherwise acquire, transfer directly or indirectly, receive, possess.”
(PS) Kimball v. Sacramento's DA's Off. (E.D. Cal. 2025). “24 § 2332h (providing criminal penalties for violations under 18 U.S.C. § 2332h). Finally, in 25 light of the recommendation to dismiss Plaintiff’s federal claims, the Court recommends 26 declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claim alleged…”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332h(a) — 1 case
United States v. Crawford, 714 F. App'x 27 (2d Cir. 2017). “Count One Crawford was convicted under Count One for violating 18 U.S.C. § 2332h, which makes it “unlawful for any person to knowingly produce, construct, otherwise acquire, transfer directly or indirectly, receive, possess.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 2332h(a)(l)(A) — 1 case
United States v. Brahm, 520 F. Supp. 2d 619 (D.N.J. 2007). “, § 2332a(a)(l)(D) (weapons of mass destruction), and 18 U.S.C. § 2332h(a)(l)(A) (radiological dispersion devices, or “dirty bombs”).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.