Notes of Decisions
United States v. Dylann Roof, 10 F.4th 314 (4th Cir. 2021).
· cites it 12× “Issue 17: Congress Did Not Exceed Its Thirteenth Amendment Authority in Enacting the Hate Crimes Prevention Act, 18 U.S.C. § 249 .........................”
Bostock v. Clayton Cnty., 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020).
· cites it 4× “, 18 U. S. C. §249 (a)(2)(A) (hate crimes) (enacted 2009); 34 U.”
United States v. Samuel Mullet, Sr., 767 F.3d 585 (6th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 16× “18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(2)(A). In instructing the jury on this point, the district court rejected the defendants’ proposed instruction (that the faith of the victims must be a “but for” cause of the assaults) and adopted the government’s proposed instruction (that the faith of the…”
United States v. James Hill, III, 927 F.3d 188 (4th Cir. 2019).
· cites it 18× “2 WYNN, Circuit Judge: In this appeal, we confront the issue of whether the federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (“Hate Crimes Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(2), may be constitutionally applied to an unarmed assault of a victim engaged in commercial activity at his place of…”
United States v. Charles Cannon, 750 F.3d 492 (5th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 14× “Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (“Shepard-Byrd Act”), 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(1), for attacking Yondel Johnson.”
United States v. Diggins, 36 F.4th 302 (1st Cir. 2022).
· cites it 12× “A jury convicted Maurice Diggins ("Diggins") of two counts of committing a hate crime and one count of conspiring to commit a hate crime under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr.”
United States v. Hatch, 722 F.3d 1193 (10th Cir. 2013).
· cites it 12× “2835 (2009), codified in relevant part at 18 U.S.C. § 249 . As relevant here, the Hate Crimes Act makes it a felony to physically attack a person because of that person’s race.”
Gary Glenn v. Eric Holder, Jr., 690 F.3d 417 (6th Cir. 2012).
· cites it 8× “” 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(2)(A). The enacted statute also includes six uncodified “Rules of Construction.”
United States v. Roof, 225 F. Supp. 3d 438 (D.S.C. 2016).
· cites it 10× “) A month later, a federal grand jury returned a 33-count indictment charging Defendant with multiple counts of five offenses: • Counts 1-9 allege racially motivated hate crimes resulting in death, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(1); • Counts 10-12 allege racially motivated…”
United States v. Ole Hougen, 76 F.4th 805 (9th Cir. 2023).
· cites it 10× “HOUGEN SUMMARY ** Criminal Law The panel affirmed Ole Hougen’s conviction after a jury trial of attempting to commit racially motivated violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(1). The district court conducted the trial under General Orders, issued in response to the…”
United States v. James Hill, III, 700 F. App'x 235 (4th Cir. 2017).
· cites it 11× “Consequently, the United States indicted Hill for violating 18 U.S.C. § 249 (a)(2). The district court dismissed the indictment, finding § 249(a)(2) unconstitutional as applied to Hill.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 249(a)(1) — 1 case
United States v. Diggins, 36 F.4th 302 (1st Cir. 2022).
“A jury convicted Maurice Diggins ("Diggins") of two counts of committing a hate crime and one count of conspiring to commit a hate crime under the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.