18 U.S.C. § 3234
Change of venue to another district—(Rule)
Plea or disposal of case in district other than that in which defendant was arrested, Rule 20.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1992–2004 · leading case: United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D L Graham, Also Known as Danny Lee, 374 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 2004).
United States v. Daniel Lewis Lee, Also Known as Daniel Lewis Graham, Also Known as D L Graham, Also Known as Danny Lee, 374 F.3d 637 (8th Cir. 2004). “Lee further asserts that his right to effective assistance of counsel was violated because his trial attorneys failed to make several pretrial objections, including objections to restrictions on his ability to review discovery materials and to oppose the government’s motion to…”
United States v. John Clyde Walkingeagle, 974 F.2d 551 (4th Cir. 1992). “Keeble stands only for the proposition that Congress, through the Act, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 3234 , has provided additional safeguards to Indian defendants by allowing them to receive the benefits of a lesser included offense instruction without necessarily entailing the…”
United States v. Daniel L. Lee (8th Cir. 2004). “-22- Lee further asserts that his right to effective assistance of counsel was violated because his trial attorneys failed to make several pretrial objections, including objections to restrictions on his ability to review discovery materials and to oppose the government's motion…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.