18 U.S.C. § 3236
Murder or manslaughter
In all cases of murder or manslaughter, the offense shall be deemed to have been committed at the place where the injury was inflicted, or the poison administered or other means employed which caused the death, without regard to the place where the death occurs.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1958–2023 · leading case: United States v. Wilson
United States v. Wilson (1983)
“18 U.S.C. § 3236 . See Johnson v. United States, 225 U.”
United States v. Palma-Ruedas (1997)
“" 18 U.S.C. § 3236 . 8. Indeed, the dissent artfully suggests just how such a statute might be written.”
United States v. Cores (1958)
“§ 1073 (flight to avoid prosecution or giving testimony); 18 U. S. C. § 3236 (murder or manslaughter); 18 U.”
State v. Lane (1989)
“18 U.S.C. § 3236 . As petitioners' argument goes, this statute preempts Washington's criminal jurisdiction statute.”
United States v. Perez (1996)
“Ramos bases this argument on a combined reading of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3236 and 3237(a). 18 U.S.C. § 3236 provides, in relevant part: In all cases of Murder or Manslaughter, the offense shall be deemed to have been committed at the place where the injury was inflicted.”
United States v. James Arthur Parker, United States of America v. Melvin Ward, United States of America v. Bobby Todd (1980)
“§ 1111 is governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3236 , which reads in pertinent part as follows: In all cases of murder or manslaughter, the offense shall be deemed to have been committed at the place where the injury was inflicted, * * * or other means employed which caused the death,…”
United States v. Reed (1985)
“Congress nevertheless determined that venue should lie "where the injury was inflicted, or the poison administered or other means employed which caused the death, without regard to the place where the death occurs.” It is not clear whether section 1503 does focus on intended…”
Campos v. Las Cruces Nursing Center (2011)
“necessary to decide whether exhaustion is jurisdictional under Title VII after Jones v.”
United States v. Robert Anthony Eder, A/K/A Bobby Eder (1988)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 3236 (1982). Here, the district court instructed the jury that in order to find Eder guilty of second-degree murder the Government must establish beyond a reasonable doubt “that the act of killing Shelena Skye Olson was committed in ‘Indian Country,’ that is,…”
United States v. Artie Ray Dufur, AKA Artie Ray Baker (1980)
“18 U.S.C. § 3236 . Since the place of death no longer determines jurisdiction, it may no longer be an “essential ingredient of the offense” whose averment is required by Ball .”
United States v. Levy Auto Parts of Canada, United States of America v. Morris P. Levy, Al Raskin (1986)
“In the same bill in which it accomplished the 1948 amendment of § 3238, it provided in 18 U.S.C.A. § 3236 that in all cases of murder or manslaughter the offense shall be deemed to have been committed in the place where the injury was inflicted, regardless of the place of death.”
United States v. Bobby Todd (1981)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 3236 . Defendant argues that there was no substantial evidence that Williams’ death was caused within the boundaries of Fort Leonard Wood.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.