18 U.S.C. § 341
Definitions
As used in this chapter, the term “common carrier” means a locomotive, a rail carrier, a sleeping car carrier, a bus transporting passengers in interstate commerce, a water common carrier, and an air common carrier.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1981–2021 · leading case: United States v. Sean Fitzgerald
United States v. Sean Fitzgerald (2018)
“See 18 U.S.C. § 341 (distinguishing various types of common carriers).”
United States v. Elie F. Abboud (04-3942) and Michel Abboud (04-3943) (2006)
“The problem, however, is the affidavit incorporated to support the finding of probable cause for this single crime also listed additional offenses for which the affiant also found probable cause: violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 341 ,1343, 1956, 1957 and violations of 28 U.”
State v. Borner (2013)
“Therefore, as knowledge of the government’s ownership of the property alleged to have been stolen in violation of § 641 is not required, such knowledge is also irrelevant to the intent necessary to establish a conspiracy to commit such a theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 341 as…”
United States v. Parker (2001)
“Therefore, as knowledge of the government’s ownership of the property alleged to have been stolen in violation of § 641 is not required, such knowledge is also irrelevant to the intent necessary to establish a conspiracy to commit such a theft in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 341 as…”
United States v. Pepper (1995)
“See 18 U.S.C. §§ 341 , 343. Because a fraudulent scheme is an element of his offenses of mail and wire fraud, actions pursuant to that scheme are conduct underlying the offense of conviction.”
United States v. Cope (2012)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 341 . “An individual with a blood alcohol content of .”
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Milan Group, Inc. (2013)
“Pavlico was on release from custody pending trial, but the United States moved to revoke his bond due to allegations that Mr.”
United States v. McClendon (1999)
“The indictment charged, among other things, conspiracy to commit Medicaid fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 341 and money laundering in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Charles C. Clark and Jay G. Denney (1981)
“Defendants were indicted on one count of conspiracy to defraud by use of the United States mails in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 341 , and seven substantive counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Sangemino (2001)
“In this case, defendant Daniel Sangemi-no has pled guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 341 . He is before the Court for sentencing.”
Michael Phillips v. County of Essex Department of (2021)
“§§ 371 , 1341, and 1346; (9) “fraud or swindles,” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 341 ; (10) money laundering, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Donald Edward Smith (2021)
“PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 18-14759 Date Filed: 08/23/2021 Page: 2 of 5 Donald Edward Smith appeals his convictions that were entered on pleas of guilty to conspiring to commit wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 341 , and tax fraud, 26 U.S.C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.