18 U.S.C. § 3484
Subpoenas—(Rule)
Form, contents and issuance of subpoena, Rule 17(a).
Service in United States, Rule 17(d), (e,1).
Service in foreign country, Rule 17(d), (e,2).
Indigent defendants, Rule 17(b).
On taking depositions, Rule 17(f).
Papers and documents, Rule 17(c).
Disobedience of subpoena as contempt of court, Rule 17(g).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 2005–2008 · leading case: The New York Times Company v. Alberto Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and t
The New York Times Company v. Alberto Gonzales, in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States, and t (2006)
“Although Rule 17 itself is not a statute, it is referenced by 18 U.S.C. § 3484 . The government contends that Rule 17(c) is a special statutory proceeding within the meaning of the Advisory Committee’s Note and that its existence therefore renders declaratory relief…”
The New York Times Co. v. Gonzales (2005)
“The government argues that Rule 17 is a form of statute because it is referenced in 18 U.S.C. § 3484 . 13 . Rule 6(e)(3) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: (E) The court may authorize disclosure— at a time, in a manner, and subject to any other conditions that it directs —…”
United States v. Baker (2005)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 3484 (a). A federal prisoner is entitled to credit for a state sentence “only when it was exclusively the product of such action by federal law-enforcement officials as to justify treating the state jail as the practicaRequivalent of a federal one.”
United States v. Hernandez (2008)
“See 18 U.S.C. § 3484 (a) (outlining a district court’s authority to impose concurrent or consecutive terms of imprisonment; noting that “if a term of imprisonment is imposed on a defendant who is already subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment, the terms may run…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.