U.S. Code » Title 18 » Part PART II— CRIMINAL PROCEDURE › Chapter CHAPTER 224— PROTECTION OF WITNESSES

18 U.S.C. § 3526

Cooperation of other Federal agencies and State governments; reimbursement of expenses

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Each Federal agency shall cooperate with the Attorney General in carrying out the provisions of this chapter and may provide, on a reimbursable basis, such personnel and services as the Attorney General may request in carrying out those provisions.(b) In any case in which a State government requests the Attorney General to provide protection to any person under this chapter—(1) the Attorney General may enter into an agreement with that State government in which that government agrees to reimburse the United States for expenses incurred in providing protection to that person under this chapter; and(2) the Attorney General shall enter into an agreement with that State government in which that government agrees to cooperate with the Attorney General in carrying out the provisions of this chapter with respect to all persons.(Added Pub. L. 98–473, title II, § 1208, Oct. 12, 1984, 98 Stat. 2162.)Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section effective Oct. 1, 1984, see section 1210 of Pub. L. 98–473, set out as a note under section 3521 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2025 · leading case: Hart v. Arpaio
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hart v. Arpaio (2001) ca9 “MEMORANDUM *** Maricopa County and Sheriff Joe Arpaio appeal the district court’s order refusing to terminate a consent decree in accordance with the provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3526 (b). The district court relied on the panel opinion in…”
HOLLAND v. GABBY (2025) flnd “See 18 U.S.C. § 3526 (g)(1)(a) (restricting application of earned time credits to prisoners who have earned credits “in an amount that is equal to the remainder of the prisoner’s imposed term of imprisonment.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.