18 U.S.C. § 3532

Setting aside verdict of guilty; judgment notwithstanding verdict—(Rule)

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 18 CasesGoogle Scholar
See Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

Setting aside verdict of guilty on motion for judgment of acquittal, entering of such judgment, or ordering new trial; absence of verdict, Rule 29(b).

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 837.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2025 · leading case: United States v. Antonio Davis, 99 F.4th 647 (4th Cir. 2024).
United States v. Antonio Davis, 99 F.4th 647 (4th Cir. 2024). “5194 , 5339 (2018); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3532 (c)(1)(A); United States v.”
Swan v. Rokosky (D. Maryland 2025). “PATTERN does not comply with 18 U.S.C. §3532 (a)(5)(A) and violates the Administrative Procedures Act.”
United States v. Segura-Lara (5th Cir. 2006). “Due to this history, a special condition prohibiting the use of illegal drugs, controlled substances, or addictive medication such as listed in Ferguson would be considered reasonably necessary for deterrence, public safety, or medical care, see 18 U.S.C. § 3532 (b)(7) (listing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.