18 U.S.C. § 3586
Implementation of a sentence of imprisonment
The implementation of a sentence of imprisonment is governed by the provisions of subchapter C of chapter 229 and, if the sentence includes a term of supervised release, by the provisions of subchapter A of chapter 229.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2022 · leading case: Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt.
Smith, D. v. PA Board of Probation & Parole, Aplt. (2017)
“On appeal, the Commonwealth Court noted federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 3586 provides a defendant shall be given credit for any time spent in detention prior to sentencing;, so long as credit for the same period of confinement had not been given to any other sentence.”
Taylor v. Sawyer (2002)
“Taylor argues that reliance on Del Guzzi is misplaced because that case involved sentences governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3586 (1982), which has been repealed and replaced with 18 U.”
Dutton v. U.S. Attorney General (2010)
“The BOP, acting as the designee of the United States Attorney General, has the responsibility for computing a term of incarceration pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3586 . An inmate’s sentence is not officially calculated until the inmate is transferred to an institution designated by…”
Watson v. United States Parole Commission (2012)
“Code statutory provisions, 18 U.S.C. § 3586 , for sentences imposed for offenses committed prior to November 1, 1987, and 18 U.”
United States v. Jones (1994)
“18 U.S.C. § 3586 . Even if that were not the case, Jones’ possession and manufacture of the bomb, being part of the course of conduct that led to his wife’s death, was accounted for by his state court sentence.”
In re Morris (2009)
“See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3586 , 3621(b). The Bureau has in place an administrative remedy program, as well as procedures for requesting compassionate release and criteria for home confinement.”
United States v. Thomas Darwish (2018)
“See 18 U.S.C. § 3586 (directing implementation to be done in accordance with subchapter C of chapter 229); 18 U.”
Middleton v. Ormond (2022)
“Congress intended that the sentencing court compute a fair sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines at the time of sentencing, but that the BOP make all post-judgment sentencing credit calculations pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3586 and 3624. The time to present an argument for a…”
In re Morris (2009)
“See 18 U.S.C. §§ 3586 , 3621(b). The Bureau has in place an administrative remedy program, as well as procedures for requesting compassionate release and criteria for home confinement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.