18 U.S.C. § 3597
Use of State facilities
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2000–2020 · leading case: In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases
In re: FBOP Execution Protocol Cases (2020)
“Compare 18 U.S.C. § 3597 (a) (“A United States marshal charged with supervising the implementation of a sentence of death may use appropriate State or local facilities for the purpose, may use the services of an appropriate State or local official or of a person such an official…”
Roane v. Holder (2009)
“The defendants’ motion to dismiss all official capacity claims against defendant Thomas Webster, M.”
United States v. Sampson (2004)
“18 U.S.C. § 3597 (a) provides that: A United States marshal charged with supervising the implementation of a sentence of death may use appropriate State or local facilities for the purpose, may use the services of an appropriate State or local official or of a person such an…”
United States v. Hammer (2000)
“In addition, 18 U.S.C. § 3597 would, (sic) be modified to provide for the use of Federal Facilities in carrying out Federal executions.”
Roane v. Gonzales (2009)
“18 U.S.C. § 3597 (b). In addition, under 28 C.”
United States v. Madison (2018)
“18 U.S.C. § 3597 (emphasis added). The Implementation and Use Provisions, Defendant submits, conscript state officials and state facilities to conduct federal executions in violation of the Tenth Amendment's anticommandeering principle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.