18 U.S.C. § 3605
Transfer of jurisdiction over a probationer
A court, after imposing a sentence, may transfer jurisdiction over a probationer or person on supervised release to the district court for any other district to which the person is required to proceed as a condition of his probation or release, or is permitted to proceed, with the concurrence of such court. A later transfer of jurisdiction may be made in the same manner. A court to which jurisdiction is transferred under this section is authorized to exercise all powers over the probationer or releasee that are permitted by this subchapter or subchapter B or D of chapter 227.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 94
cases (21 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case: United States v. King
United States v. King (2010)
“That statute, 18 U.S.C. § 3605 , provides that “[a] court to which jurisdiction is transferred under this section is authorized to exercise all powers over the probationer or releasee that are permitted by this subchapter or subchapter B or D of chapter 227” — which includes the…”
United States v. Mir Islam (2019)
“But a transfer decision is left to the district court's discretion, 18 U.S.C. § 3605 , and there is no reasonable probability that the court here would have ordered a transfer.”
United States v. Sastrom (2024)
“But there is a rub: Sastrom's case has since been transferred to the District of Connecticut, which is in another circuit, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3605 . Given this transfer, we currently lack authority to adjust Sastrom's supervised release conditions and cannot provide any…”
United States v. Fernandez (2004)
“On August 15, 2003, Fernandez filed motions with the Northern District Court to dismiss the supervised release violations filed against him, arguing that the Northern District Court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his supervised release imposed by the Western District Court…”
United States v. Wayne (2010)
“District Court for the District of Colorado (the “district court”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3605 . The probation office subsequently sent a memorandum to the district court recommending that it conduct a compliance review hearing because of Ms.”
United States v. Mark Manuel, Jr. (2013)
“On June 15, 2009, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania accepted a transfer of jurisdiction over Manuel’s supervised release from the Eastern District of Virginia pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3605 . Between 2009 and 2011, Manuel repeatedly violated the conditions of his supervised…”
United States v. Cedric Adams (2013)
“Title 18 U.S.C. § 3605 governs jurisdiction over releasees under supervision and states: A court, after imposing a sentence, may transfer jurisdiction over a probationer or person on supervised release to the district court for any other district to which the person is required…”
United States v. Martin Sanbria-Bueno (2013)
“At the time, Sanbria-Bueno was still on supervised release for his earlier offense, and the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio accepted a transfer of jurisdiction of his supervision under 18 U.S.C. § 3605 . Sanbria-Bueno pled guilty to illegal reentry.”
United States v. Moshe Gozlon-Peretz (1990)
“5 The problem is compounded by the fact that supervision by the judiciary is frequently transferred from one district to *1406 another, see 18 U.S.C. § 3605 , and the transferee district may be in a different circuit with a different rule as to whether special parole or…”
United States v. Joseph R. Malesic (1994)
“Supervision by the judiciary is frequently transferred from one district to another, see 18 U.S.C. § 3605 , and the transferee district may be in a circuit with a different rule.”
United States v. Vaughn Johnson (2017)
“12 See 18 U.S.C. § 3605 ; cf. United States v. Adams, 723 F.”
United States v. Rahmaan El Herman (2020)
“18 U.S.C. § 3605 . 1 The Honorable Leonard T.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.