18 U.S.C. § 3662
Conviction records
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: Truesdale v. United States Dep't of Just., 657 F. Supp. 2d 219 (D.D.C. 2009).
Truesdale v. United States Dep't of Just., 657 F. Supp. 2d 219 (D.D.C. 2009). “§ 848 ) as required under 18 U.S.C. § 3662 , their refusal to release records under the FOIA, and their failure to maintain the records themselves with the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness required under the Privacy Act.”
Truesdale v. United States Dep't of Just., 803 F. Supp. 2d 44 (D.D.C. 2011). “OIP staff concluded that plaintiff sought “records pertaining to 18 U.S.C. § 3662 , which states that the Attorney General ‘is authorized to establish in the [DOJ] a repository for records of convictions and determinations of the validity of such convictions.”
United States v. Gilberg, 75 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 1996). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3662 (a)(1) (emphasis added).”
Wayne Levesque v. Edward Brennan & the United States Parole Comm'n, 864 F.2d 515 (7th Cir. 1988). “Under 18 U.S.C. § 3662 the sentencing court has wide discretion in ordering restitution and fixing the amount.”
United States v. Richard Shaffer, 807 F.3d 943 (8th Cir. 2015). “tablished under chapter 6, title 28, United States Code, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, the District Court of Guam, the District Court of the Virgin Islands, the United States Court of Federal Claims, the Tax Court of…”
Truesdale v. United States Dep't of Just. (D.D.C. 2011). “OIP staff concluded that plaintiff sought “records pertaining to 18 U.S.C. § 3662 , which states that the Attorney General ‘is authorized to establish in the [DOJ] a repository for records of convictions and determinations of the validity of such convictions.”
Truesdale v. United States Dep't of Just. (D.D.C. 2009). “Plaintiff’s FOIA, Privacy Act, and Bivens Claims Against the Individual Defendants Must Be Dismissed Plaintiff ties defendants’ violations of the FOIA and the Privacy Act to their alleged failure to maintain a repository of records under 18 U.S.C. § 3662 pertaining to his CCE 11…”
Maria Navarro-Martin v. State of Florida (11th Cir. 2025). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3662 (a). When a defendant is convicted “in a court of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, [or] a territory or possession of the United States” of an offense punishable “by death or imprisonment in excess of one year” or…”
RICHARDSON v. United States (D.N.J. 2021). “currently has a § 2255 motion pending before the Court in which he challenges his conviction on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel.”
Reynolds v. Young (S.D.W. Va 2021). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3662 (a)(2). Further, the Court “shall give substantial weight to any adverse impact on public safety or the operation of a criminal justice system caused by the preliminary relief and shall respect the principles of comity set out in paragraph (1)(b) in tailoring…”
Rapid Enter., LLC v. United States Postal Serv. (10th Cir. 2025). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3662 (a) (emphasis added). Relatedly, 39 U.”
United States v. Cockerham, 919 F.2d 285 (5th Cir. 1990). “§ 3580 (recodified 18 U.S.C. § 3662 ), require the sentencing judge to resolve any disputes as to the proper amount of restitution.”
— 18 U.S.C. § 3662(b) — 1 case
Maria Navarro-Martin v. State of Florida (11th Cir. 2025). “” 18 U.S.C. § 3662 (a). When a defendant is convicted “in a court of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, [or] a territory or possession of the United States” of an offense punishable “by death or imprisonment in excess of one year” or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.