18 U.S.C. § 4007
Expenses of prisoners
The expenses attendant upon the confinement of persons arrested or committed under the laws of the United States, as well as upon the execution of any sentence of a court thereof respecting them, shall be paid out of the Treasury of the United States in the manner provided by law.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1949–2021 · leading case: William A. White v. Dennis Lemma
William A. White v. Dennis Lemma (2020)
“White’s latest action alleges that the Sheriff and his counsel, through their counterclaim, unlawfully double billed the government for White’s prison costs, that their counterclaim arose to actionable abuse of process, and that the United States Department of the Treasury must…”
Washington v. Reno (1994)
“Particularly, the plaintiffs point to 18 U.S.C. § 4007 which provides: The expenses attendant upon the confinement of persons arrested or committed under the laws of the United States, as well as upon the execution of any sentence of a court thereof respecting them, shall be…”
United States v. Rene Spiropoulos (1992)
“4463 (November 18, 1988) (codified at 18 U.S.C.A. § 4007 (West, 1992 Supp.)) (emphasis added).”
Younger v. United States (In Re Younger) (1994)
“18 U.S.C.A. § 4007 (1985 & Supp.1994). Section 4007 does not change the result in the case at bar.”
United States v. Ruth Alston Breeding (1997)
“4463 (1988)(codified at 18 U.S.C.A. § 4007 (West Supp.1996)). Such a command implies, according to the Spiropoulos court, that “study” is the only permissible activity for the Commission.”
Sprouse v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (1973)
“Additionally, 18 U.S.C.A. § 4007 provides: The expense attendant upon the confinement of persons arrested or committed under the laws of the United States, as well as upon the execution of any sentence of a court thereof respecting them, shall be paid out of the Treasury of the…”
Columbia Hospital of Richland County v. United States (1953)
“18 U. S. C. § 4007 . Expenses of prisoners.”
Hager v. U.S. Attorney General (2021)
“§ 4001 (a) of the “Non-Detention Act,” 18 U.S.C. § 4007 , and the Eighth Amendment.”
Columbia Hospital v. United States (1949)
“” 18 U.S.C.A. § 4007 . “Subsistence for prisoners.”
William A. White v. Dennis Lemma (2020)
“White’s latest action alleges that the Sheriff and his counsel, through their counterclaim, unlawfully double billed the government for White’s prison costs, that their counterclaim arose to actionable abuse of process, and that the United States Department of the Treasury must…”
Hill v. Streeval (2020)
“§ 4001 (a)3; (2) the warden is “illegally withholding Hill from his liberty interest”in violation of due process; (3) his continued detention violates the Thirteenth Amendment and the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment; and (4) the warden is violating…”
Murray v. Grondolsky (2010)
“Murray challenged that term of the agreement, asserting that all expenses attendant to his incarceration must be paid out of the United States Treasury, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4007 , and that he is exempt from paying any cost of incarceration fee, pursuant to 28 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.