18 U.S.C. § 4107
Verification of consent of offender to transfer from the United States
“United States magistrate judge” substituted for “United States magistrate” in subsec. (a) pursuant to section 321 of Pub. L. 101–650, set out as a note under section 631 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1982–2022 · leading case: Jesse Lopez Tavarez, Ex Parte v. U. S. Attorney General
Jesse Lopez Tavarez, Ex Parte v. U. S. Attorney General (1982)
“Tavarez relies heavily on 18 U.S.C. § 4107 (b)(2), under which the transferee must give his consent that “the sentence shall be carried out according to the laws of the country to which he is to be transferred.”
United States v. Escovio Rios (2022)
“V, § 2, 1977 WL 181724 ; accord 18 U.S.C. § 4107 (b)(2) (same language in the Foreign Offenders Transfer Act, the Treaty’s implementing legislation).”
James Edward Verner v. United States Parole Commission (1998)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 4107 (b)(2). By voluntarily consenting to the transfer, the Commission argues, Verner has waived the right to challenge the applicability of the sentencing guidelines, which contain no parole availability, to his sentence.”
Carberry v. Hess (1990)
“Similarly, in his fourth claim for relief, plaintiff alleges that the operation and effect of 18 U.S.C. § 4107 (b)(2) has caused him and will continue to cause him a deprivation of rights secured to him by the United States Constitution.”
Verner v. U.S. Parole (1998)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 4107 (b)(2). By voluntarily consenting to the transfer, the Commission argues, Verner has Verner’s other foreign convictions were excluded from his criminal history 4 computation pursuant to U.”
Soering v. McDonnell (2012)
“18 U.S.C. § 4107 (b)(4). Additionally, in his letter to Governor McDonnell confirming receipt of the Commonwealth’s revocation of consent, Attorney General Holder specifically stated that nothing in the Convention or federal law prohibited the Governor from revoking consent…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.