18 U.S.C. § 4121
Federal Prison Industries; board of directors
“Federal Prison Industries”, a government corporation of the District of Columbia, shall be administered by a board of six directors, appointed by the President to serve at the will of the President without compensation.
The directors shall be representatives of (1) industry, (2) labor, (3) agriculture, (4) retailers and consumers, (5) the Secretary of Defense, and (6) the Attorney General, respectively.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2023 · leading case: Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.
Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (2004)
“” 13 18 U.S.C. § 4121 (2003). Section 4122(a) 14 vests UNICOR with broad discretion to manage inmate operations, providing, in pertinent part: [UNICOR] shall determine in what manner and to what extent industrial operations shall be carried on in Federal penal and correctional…”
Galvan, Gilbert W. v. Fed Pris Indust Inc (1999)
“Galvan argues that Congress waived FPI’s immunity both in FPI’s organic statute, 18 U.S.C. § 4121 , and in the False Claims Act, 31 U.”
Douglas COUPAR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR), Respondents (1997)
“(“FPI,” also known by the trade name “UNICOR”) is a statutorily-created government corporation, 18 U.S.C. § 4121 , whose purpose is to provide work to inmates confined in federal institutions, see 28 C.”
Aaron v. United States (2002)
“18 U.S.C. § 4121 ; 28 C.F.R. § 345.11 (2001).”
Awalt v. Whalen (1992)
“18 U.S.C. §§ 4121 et seq. He has delegated the authority to exercise this discretion to the Board of Directors of Federal Prison Industries.”
John J.M. Obremski v. Office of Personnel Management and Merit Systems Protection Board (1983)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 4121 (1976). FPI, like the Bureau of Prisons, is a unit within the Department of Justice.”
Emory v. United States (1983)
“It should be noted that the Congress, in 18 U.S.C. §§ 4121-4128 (1976), has enacted specific legislation whereby all physically fit inmates of federal prisons may be provided employment.”
William M. Nicastro v. Janet Reno (1996)
“4914 (1990), cited at 18 U.S.C. § 4121 note (1994) (Mandatory Work Requirement for All Prisoners).”
Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United States of America, Howard v. Bradshaw and Ona Bradshaw v. United States (1971)
“18 U.S.C. § 4121 (1964). The Attorney General regulates and administers the compensation scheme which was at issue in the suit.”
Associated Industries of Alabama, Inc. v. Britton (1979)
“18 U.S.C. § 4121 . The first issue of unconstitutionality concerns Sec.”
Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries (2001)
“” 18 U.S.C. § 4121 . One of the six directors represents the Secretary of Defense, one represents the Attorney General, and the remaining four represent the private sector.”
Earl Jason Lariscey v. The United States (1991)
“See 18 U.S.C. § 4121 et seq. Since 1978 UNICOR has manufactured military helmets at the Bastrop prison facility.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.