18 U.S.C. § 547
Depositing goods in buildings on boundaries
Whoever receives or deposits any merchandise in any building upon the boundary line between the United States and any foreign country, or carries any merchandise through the same, in violation of law, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1932–2021 · leading case: Hatfield v. Sessions
Hatfield v. Sessions (2018)
“§ 1001 (a) ); depositing merchandise in a building upon the boundary line between the United States and any foreign country ( 18 U.S.C. § 547 ); operating or holding any interest in a gambling establishment on a ship ( 18 U.”
Quinn v. State (1957)
“Sections of the United States Criminal Code under which the acts of petitioner might have been punished are modified by 18 U.S.C.A. § 547 (Cr.Code, § 326), which provides: ‘Nothing in sections 1 to 553, 567, 568 and 571 of this title (Crimes) shall be held to take away or impair…”
State v. McMurry (1995)
“§ 3231 , formerly 18 U.S.C. § 547 , to decide that passing counterfeit coin expressly excepted from law giving exclusive jurisdiction to United States).”
Murray v. Hildreth (1932)
“§ 547 that nothing contained in sections 1 to 553 of that title, which includes section 451, the statute under consideration, “shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof.”
Frach v. Mass (1939)
“18 U.S.C.A. § 547 provides: “Nothing in sections 1 to 553 * * * of this title shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof”.”
Bowling v. Slayton (1972)
“The court also pointed out in Van Dyke that 18 U.S.C. § 547 provides “Nothing in sections 1 to 553, 567, 568 and 571 of this title [Crimes] shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof.”
Frison v. United States (2021)
“Another vendor, Soukeye Fox, was also selling counterfeit merchandise at the market and was convicted in relation to that activity as a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 547 . United States v. Fox, 4:13 CR 241 AGF (E.”
Scope of Criminal Enforcement Under 42 U.S.C. § 1320d-6 (2005)
“, 18 U.S.C. § 547 (2000) (“Whoever receives or deposits merchandise in any building upon the boundary line between the United States and any foreign country, or carries merchandise through the same, in violation of law .”
United States v. Sasscer (1982)
“18 U.S.C. § 547 (1940): Nothing in this title [Title 18] shall be held to take away or impair the jurisdiction of the courts of the several States under the laws thereof.”
Koolstra v. Sullivan (1989)
“Attorneys are set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 547 . That section provides that U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.