Notes of Decisions
Nikolay Tantchev v. Merrick B. Garland, 46 F.4th 431 (6th Cir. 2022).
· cites it 8× “Relevant to this appeal, Tantchev was charged with exporting stolen vehicles under 18 U.S.C. § 553 . Id. at 650, 652 . The case went to trial, and the jury convicted Tantchev on all charges.”
United States v. Myat Maung, 267 F.3d 1113 (11th Cir. 2001).
· cites it 2× “§ 2321 (a) by receiving and possessing with intent to sell cars with altered identification numbers, and on one count of exporting stolen cars in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 553 . The district court sentenced Maung to 39 months in prison and ordered him to pay $218,895.”
United States v. Nikolay Tantchev, 916 F.3d 645 (7th Cir. 2019).
“See 18 U.S.C. § 553 (a) ("Whoever knowingly imports, exports or attempts to import or export-(1) any motor vehicle.”
United States v. Myat Maung, 320 F.3d 1305 (11th Cir. 2003).
“§ 2321 (a) by receiving and possessing with intent to sell cars with altered identification numbers, and on one count of exporting stolen cars in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 553 . In a previous appeal, we affirmed Maung’s conviction but reversed his 39-month sentence because we…”
United States v. Laday, 56 F.3d 24 (5th Cir. 1995).
“POLITZ, Chief Judge: Ashton Laday appeals the rejection of his motion to withdraw his plea of nolo contende-re to the charge of exportation of a stolen vehicle, 18 U.S.C. § 553 . For the reasons assigned we vacate the sentence and remand for compliance with the plea agreement…”
United States v. Exarhos, 135 F.3d 723 (11th Cir. 1998).
· cites it 2× “export stolen vehicles in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 553 (a). Count 2. Defendants Morrison and Exarhos possessed a vehicle part (Porsche engine) with * Honorable Harry W.”
United States v. Reid, 206 F. Supp. 2d 132 (D. Mass. 2002).
“18 U.S.C. § 553 (a)(1). An armed forces provision authorizes the Secretary of Defense to institute a system of reporting to Congress on the readiness of the armed forces, including a measurement of “the extent to which units of the armed forces remove serviceable parts,…”
Bostic v. Rives, 107 F.2d 649 (D.C. Cir. 1939).
“1152 , 18 U.S.C.A. § 553 ], Under this statute the allegation in the indictment that the injury causing the death was inflicted in the District affirmatively showed jurisdiction.”
United States v. Luis Ledesma, 60 F.3d 750 (11th Cir. 1995).
“ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Ledesma pled guilty to knowingly attempting to export two stolen motor vehicles, a Lexus and a Mercedes 560 SL convertible, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 553 (a). He was sentenced to nine months imprisonment.”
United States v. Michael Collazo-Martinez, 880 F.2d 1496 (1st Cir. 1989).
· cites it 3× “Michael Collazo Martinez (“Collazo”) appeals from his conviction for attempted exportation of a stolen vehicle, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 553 (a)(1). 1 During the period in question, Collazo was employed as a police officer by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.