18 U.S.C. § 896
Effect on State laws
This chapter does not preempt any field of law with respect to which State legislation would be permissible in the absence of this chapter. No law of any State which would be valid in the absence of this chapter may be held invalid or inapplicable by virtue of the existence of this chapter, and no officer, agency, or instrumentality of any State may be deprived by virtue of this chapter of any jurisdiction over any offense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence of this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 1972–1972 · leading case: United States v. Jesse Smith and Rocco Lauria
United States v. Jesse Smith and Rocco Lauria (1972)
“It should be noted that 18 U.S.C. § 896 specifically provides that the federal statute was not intended to preempt any state laws proscribing like conduct.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.