19 U.S.C. § 203
DRAWBACK.
“(a)Definition of a Good Subject to Chile FTA Drawback.—For purposes of this Act and the amendments made by subsection (b), the term ‘good subject to Chile FTA drawback’ means any imported good other than the following:“(1) A good entered under bond for transportation and exportation to Chile.“(2)(A) A good exported to Chile in the same condition as when imported into the United States.“(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A)—“(i) processes such as testing, cleaning, repacking, inspecting, sorting, or marking a good, or preserving it in its same condition, shall not be considered to change the condition of the good; and“(ii) if a good described in subparagraph (A) is commingled with fungible goods and exported in the same condition, the origin of the good for the purposes of subsection (j)(1) of section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1313(j)(1)) may be determined on the basis of the inventory methods provided for in the regulations implementing this title.“(3) A good—“(A) that is—“(i) deemed to be exported from the United States;“(ii) used as a material in the production of another good that is deemed to be exported to Chile; or“(iii) substituted for by a good of the same kind and quality that is used as a material in the production of another good that is deemed to be exported to Chile; and“(B) that is delivered—“(i) to a duty-free shop;“(ii) for ship’s stores or supplies for a ship or aircraft; or“(iii) for use in a project undertaken jointly by the United States and Chile and destined to become the property of the United States.“(4) A good exported to Chile for which a refund of customs duties is granted by reason of—“(A) the failure of the good to conform to sample or specification; or“(B) the shipment of the good without the consent of the consignee.“(5) A good that qualifies under the rules of origin set out in section 202 that is—“(A) exported to Chile;“(B) used as a material in the production of another good that is exported to Chile; or“(C) substituted for by a good of the same kind and quality that is used as a material in the production of another good that is exported to Chile.“(b)Consequential Amendments.—“(1)Bonded manufacturing warehouses.—[Amended section 1311 of this title.]
“(2)Bonded smelting and refining warehouses.—[Amended section 1312 of this title.]
“(3)Drawback.—[Amended section 1313 of this title.]
“(4)Manipulation in warehouse.—[Amended section 1562 of this title.]
“(5)Foreign trade zones.—[Amended section 81c of this title.]
“(c)Inapplicability to Countervailing and Antidumping Duties.—Nothing in this section or the amendments made by this section shall be considered to authorize the refund, waiver, or reduction of countervailing duties or antidumping duties imposed on an imported good.
Notes of Decisions
Wirtz v. Kip's Big Boy, Inc., 297 F. Supp. 106 (N.D. Tex. 1969).
“19 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s) (1) was amended effective February 1, 1967, deleting the “$250,000 inflow test” and reducing the annual gross dollar volume of sales to $500,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.