U.S. Code » Title 19 » Chapter CHAPTER 12— TRADE ACT OF 1974 › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— NEGOTIATING AND OTHER AUTHORITY › Part Part 1— Rates of Duty and Other Trade Barriers › Subtitle “Subtitle B— Relief From Imports Benefiting From The Agreement

19 U.S.C. § 216

SUBMISSION OF PETITIONS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar
“A petition for import relief may be submitted to the Commission under—“(1) this subtitle;“(2) chapter 1 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 [19 U.S.C. 2251 et seq.]; or“(3) under both this subtitle and such chapter 1 at the same time, in which case the Commission shall consider such petitions jointly.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc., 239 F.R.D. 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc., 239 F.R.D. 363 (S.D.N.Y. 2007). “Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 216 (b), plaintiffs seek unpaid wages and an equal amount in liquidated damages, plus reasonable attorneys’ fees.”
Pritchard v. Dent Wizard Int'l Corp., 210 F.R.D. 591 (S.D. Ohio 2002). “Plaintiff claims violations of the overtime provisions provided by the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 19 U.S.C. § 216 (b) and by Ohio’s analogous statute, the Minimum Fair Wage Standard Act, Chapter 4111 of the Ohio Revised Code, O.”
Dominic v. Consol. Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 652 F. Supp. 815 (S.D.N.Y. 1986). “§ 1988 as well as to 19 U.S.C. § 216 (b) in reaching its decision as to whether certain "out-of-pocket” costs are compensable under the anti-discrimination laws.”
Kifer v. Abilities Unlimited of Jonesboro (E.D. Ark. 2023). “8, 2010) (citing 19 U.S.C. § 216 (b)). Before approving a settlement, a court ensures that the parties are not negotiating around the FLSA’s requirements and that the settlement represents a fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute.”
Garcia v. J & J, INC. (S.D. Fla. 2019). “19-cv-60728-BLOOM/Valle JOSE GARCIA, LEDVIN ALARCON, and all others similarly situated under 219 U.S.C. § 216 (b), Plaintiffs, v. J&J, INC.”
Garcia v. J & J, INC. (S.D. Fla. 2020). “19-cv-60728-BLOOM/Valle JOSE GARCIA, LEDVIN ALARCON, and all others similarly situated under 219 U.S.C. § 216 (b), Plaintiffs, v. J&J, INC.”
Ware v. CKF Enter., Inc. (E.D. Ky. 2020). “The forty-six opt-in plaintiffs have submitted opt-in forms that explicitly account for plaintiffs’ affirmative consent to opt-in to this FLSA suit brought under 19 U.S.C. § 216 (b). [E.g., Record No. 60-1] The proposed post-approval claim form does not mention opting-in to the…”
Sanchez-Rosa v. Mun. of San Juan (D.P.R. 2020). “Accordingly, Plaintiffs filed a Memorandum in Support of Motion to Conditionally Certify a Collective Action and Facilitate Notice Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 216 (B) as well as a Supplement to Motion to Certify a Collective Action Conditionally and Facilitate Notice Pursuant to 29…”
Andrade-Barteldes v. ASA Coll., Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2024). “Previously, on December 4, 2023, the Court issued a memorandum and order, certifying a conditional collective under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 19 U.S.C. § 216 (b), and a class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.