19 U.S.C. § 2464
Review and report to Congress
The President shall submit an annual report to the Congress on the status of internationally recognized worker rights within each beneficiary developing country, including the findings of the Secretary of Labor with respect to the beneficiary country’s implementation of its international commitments to eliminate the worst forms of child labor.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1982–2004 · leading case: Florsheim Shoe Co., Div. Of Interco, Inc. v. The United States, 744 F.2d 787 (Fed. Cir. 1984).
Florsheim Shoe Co., Div. Of Interco, Inc. v. The United States, 744 F.2d 787 (Fed. Cir. 1984). “It addressed each of the three alleged grounds for the Government’s motion: (1) Florsheim lacks standing to seek review of the Presidential action challenged by the complaint; (2) The President acted within his delegated authority under Section 504 ( 19 U.S.C. § 2464 ) in…”
Int'l Labor Rights Educ. & Rsch. Fund v. George Bush, in His Off. Capacity as President, 954 F.2d 745 (D.C. Cir. 1992). “whether or not such country has taken or is taking steps to afford to workers in that country (including any designated zone in that country) internationally recognized worker rights”); 19 U.S.C. § 2464 (c)(2)(A) (requiring the President to “conduct a general review of eligible…”
Florsheim Shoe Co., Div. of Interco, Inc. v. United States, 570 F. Supp. 734 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “It should also be mentioned at this juncture that under section 504 ( 19 U.S.C. § 2464 )— the centerpiece of this litigation—the President may, or under certain circumstances must, deny duty-free treatment under the GSP.”
Int'l Labor Rights Educ. & Rsch. Fund v. Bush, 752 F. Supp. 490 (D.D.C. 1990). “19 U.S.C. § 2464 . These provisions do not constitute a law “providing for” tariffs, duties, fees or other taxes; they create conditions under which duties can be lifted or re-im *492 posed, but these duties are “provided for,” i.”
United States v. Modes, Inc., 804 F. Supp. 360 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1992). “19 U.S.C. § 2464 (c). In the course of this review, the total appraised value of goods imported from the beneficiary developing country in any given year is compared to either of two base figures.”
Motion Sys. Corp. v. Bush, 342 F. Supp. 2d 1247 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2004). “, the Federal Circuit applied essentially the same standard of review in considering a challenge to the President’s exercise of authority under the Generalized System of Preferences (“GSP”) program (specifically, Section 504 of Title Y of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2464…”
West Bend Co., Div. of Dart Indus., Inc. v. United States, 576 F. Supp. 630 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1983). “The defendant asserts that the President’s action was authorized both by the broad power given to him in 19 U.S.C. § 2464 (a) 3 to affect duty-free treatment, and the specific authority set out in 19 U.”
China Diesel Imports, Inc. v. United States, 855 F. Supp. 380 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1994). “See 19 U.S.C. § 2464 (1988) (granting executive authority to implement Generalized System of Preferences).”
North Am. Foreign Trading Corp. v. United States, 600 F. Supp. 226 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “The statute which governs withdrawal of duty-free treatment is section 504(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2464 (1982). 1 That section provides: The President may withdraw, suspend, or limit the application of the duty-free treatment accorded under section 2461 of this…”
Springfield Indus. Corp. v. United States, 663 F. Supp. 128 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1987). “Similarly, in the trade legislation which established the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) (by which importations from certain developing countries are given duty-free treatment) Section 504(a) of the Trade Act of 1974, 19 U.S.C. § 2464 (a) states as follows: The…”
Teters Floral Prods. Co., Inc. v. United States, 586 F. Supp. 960 (Ct. Intl. Trade 1984). “The statute which specifically governs withdrawal, suspension or limitation of duty-free status with regard to specific articles is 19 U.S.C. § 2464 (a). The relevant portion of Executive Order 12041 was promulgated pursuant to that statute, and § 2464(a) says not a single word…”
Int'l Labor Rights Educ. & Rsch. Fund v. Bush, 752 F. Supp. 495 (D.D.C. 1990). “” 19 U.S.C. § 2464 (c)(2)(A). The President did complete a general review on January 3, 1987.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.