19 U.S.C. § 309

STEEL PRODUCTS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 19 CasesGoogle Scholar

“Nothing in this Act shall preclude any discussion or negotiation between the United States and Canada in order to conclude voluntary restraint agreements or mutually agreed quantitative restrictions on the volume of steel products entering the United States from Canada.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Itochu Bldg. Prods. v. United States, 2012 CIT 122 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012).
Itochu Bldg. Prods. v. United States, 2012 CIT 122 (Ct. Intl. Trade 2012). “First, plaintiff points out that the notice announcing the preliminary results of the changed circumstances review did not solicit case briefs pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 309 (b)(1) and did not cite 19 C.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.