2 U.S.C. § 1555
“Federal mandate” defined
Notwithstanding section 1502 of this title, for purposes of this subchapter the term “Federal mandate” means any provision in statute or regulation or any Federal court ruling that imposes an enforceable duty upon State, local, or tribal governments including a condition of Federal assistance or a duty arising from participation in a voluntary Federal program.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2008–2020 · leading case: Sch. Dist. of City of Pontiac v. Sec'y of US Dep't of Educ., 584 F.3d 253 (6th Cir. 2009).
Sch. Dist. of City of Pontiac v. Sec'y of US Dep't of Educ., 584 F.3d 253 (6th Cir. 2009). “2 U.S.C. § 1555 (defining the phrase for purposes of a commission that would review federal mandates).”
Sch. Dist. v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Educ., 512 F.3d 252 (6th Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 1555 (defining the phrase for purposes of a commission that would review federal mandates); see also Makram B.”
Linn Cnty. v. Brown, 443 P.3d 700 (Or. Ct. App. 2019). “" 2 USC § 1555 (emphasis added); see 2 USC § 1503 (exclusions).”
Pontiac Sch. Dist v. Sec US Dept Ed (6th Cir. 2008). “2 U.S.C. § 1555 (defining the phrase for purposes of a commission that would review federal mandates); see also Makram B.”
Linn Cnty. v. Brown, 461 P.3d 966 (Or. 2020). “2 USC § 1555 . The central concern regarding “unfunded man- dates” was that the federal government was requiring state, local, and tribal governments to take certain actions with- out providing the funding needed to do so.”
Pontiac Sch. Dist v. Sec'y US Dept Ed (6th Cir. 2009). “2 U.S.C. § 1555 (defining the phrase for purposes of a commission that would review federal mandates).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.