U.S. Code » Title 2 » Chapter CHAPTER 14— FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGNS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— DISCLOSURE OF FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FUNDS

2 U.S.C. § 441a

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 200 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd · cites it 215× “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) scotus · cites it 22× “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus · cites it 18× “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
California Medical Ass'n v. Federal Election Commission (1981) scotus · cites it 25× “[1] One such provision, 2 U. S. C. § 441a (a) (1) (C), prohibits individuals and unincorporated associations such as CMA from contributing more than $5,000 per calendar year to any multicandidate political committee such as CALPAC.”
Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008) scotus · cites it 10× “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed · cites it 62× “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 · cites it 28× “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus · cites it 17× “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) nysd · cites it 15× “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commission (2010) cadc · cites it 6× “Whether the biennial aggregate contribution limit mandated by 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) violates the First Amendment by preventing Fred Young from *691 making contributions to SpeechNow.”
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (2013) dcd · cites it 17× “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
Stop This Insanity Inc Employee Leadership Fund v. Federal Election Commission (2012) dcd · cites it 14× “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
Show all 200 citing cases →
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(1)(A) — 1 case
Service Employees International Union v. Fair Political Practices Commission (1992) ca9
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(1)(B) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Rufer v. Federal Election Commission (2014) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(1)(C) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(2) — 4 cases
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Shrink Missouri Government PAC v. Adams (1998) moed
Mariani v. United States (1999) pamd
In Re Federal Election Campaign Act Litigation (1979) jpml
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(3)(A) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(5) — 1 case
Toledo Area AFL-CIO Council v. Pizza (1995) ohnd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(7) — 1 case
Carter-Mondale Reelection Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (1980) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(7)(B)(i) — 1 case
Shays v. Federal Election Commission (2005) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(7)(B)(iii) — 1 case
Shays v. Federal Election Commission (2005) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(8) — 1 case
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) — 32 cases
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) scotus “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Shays v. Federal Election Commission (2005) cadc
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1) — 9 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (2013) dcd “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(2) — 1 case
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(A) — 6 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
United States v. O'Donnell (2010) ca9
Green Party of Connecticut v. Garfield (2010) ca2
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(B) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) scotus “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
Federal Election Commission v. California Medical Ass'n (1980) cand
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(C) — 13 cases
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Carey v. Federal Election Commission (2011) dcd
Emily's List v. Federal Election Commission (2009) cadc
Federal Election Commission v. California Medical Ass'n (1980) cand
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(D) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2) — 17 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Catholic Ldrship Coaltn of TX v. David Reis (2014) ca5
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Federal Election Commission v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League (1981) cadc
Michael R. Goland v. United States of America, and Federal Election Commission, Intervenor-Appellee (1990) ca9
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(3) — 1 case
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(A) — 20 cases
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (1981) scotus
Federal Election Commission v. National Conservative Political Action Committee (1985) scotus
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(B) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union (1999) alaska
Stop Reckless Economic Instability Caused By Democrats v. Federal Election Commission (2015) vaed
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(C) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Federal Election Commission v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League (1981) cadc
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union (1999) alaska
Federal Election Commission v. Florida for Kennedy Committee (1982) ca11
Mott v. Federal Election Commission (1980) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(a) — 2 cases
Alliance for Democracy v. Federal Election Commission (2005) dcd
Walther v. Federal Election Commission (1979) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(23) — 1 case
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) — 21 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commission (2010) cadc “Whether the biennial aggregate contribution limit mandated by 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) violates the First Amendment by preventing Fred Young from *691 making contributions to SpeechNow.”
Emily's List v. Federal Election Commission (2009) cadc
United States v. F. Whittemore (2015) ca9
Jimmy Yamada v. William Snipes (2015) ca9
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3)(A) — 2 cases
Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
James v. Federal Election Commission (2012) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3)(B) — 1 case
Stop This Insanity Inc Employee Leadership Fund v. Federal Election Commission (2012) dcd “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(4) — 16 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Catholic Ldrship Coaltn of TX v. David Reis (2014) ca5
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union (1999) alaska
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(5) — 19 cases
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Real Truth About Abortion, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (2012) ca4
Federal Election Commission v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League (1981) cadc
Bread Political Action Committee v. The Federal Election Commission (1980) ca7
Federal Election Commission v. Malenick (2004) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(5)(A) — 1 case
Walther v. Federal Election Commission (1979) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(6) — 1 case
Riddle v. Hickenlooper (2013) cod
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) nysd “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Shays v. United States Federal Election Commission (2007) dcd
Clifton v. Federal Election Commission (1996) med
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B) — 7 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Shays v. Federal Election Commission (2004) dcd
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) nysd “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Stop This Insanity Inc Employee Leadership Fund v. Federal Election Commission (2012) dcd “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
Federal Election Commission v. Christian Coalition (1999) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B)(I) — 3 cases
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (1999) cod
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B)(i) — 25 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) scotus “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Shays v. Federal Election Commission (2004) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B)(ii) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Federal Election Commission v. Christian Coalition (1999) dcd
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(C) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(C)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(8) — 17 cases
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'n (2014) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) scotus “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
United States v. O'Donnell (2010) ca9
United States v. Danielczyk (2011) vaed
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(i) — 1 case
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (2010) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l) — 20 cases
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (2013) dcd “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
United States v. F. Whittemore (2015) ca9
United States v. Boender (2011) ca7
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(A) — 27 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
United States v. Michael R. Goland (1992) ca9
United States v. Rowland (2016) ca2
United States v. F. Whittemore (2015) ca9
Federal Election Commission v. James Toledano (2003) ca9
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(B) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (2013) dcd “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
Rufer v. Federal Election Commission (2014) dcd
John B. Anderson v. Federal Election Commission (1980) ca1
California Medical Ass'n v. Federal Election Commission (1980) ca9
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(C) — 20 cases
Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commission (2010) cadc “Whether the biennial aggregate contribution limit mandated by 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) violates the First Amendment by preventing Fred Young from *691 making contributions to SpeechNow.”
Stop This Insanity Inc Employee Leadership Fund v. Federal Election Commission (2012) dcd “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Emily's List v. Federal Election Commission (2009) cadc
Republican Party of New Mexico v. King (2013) ca10
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(D) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Rufer v. Federal Election Commission (2014) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(c) — 1 case
Federal Election Commission v. Florida for Kennedy Committee (1982) ca11
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(aX2) — 1 case
In Re Federal Election Campaign Act Litigation (1979) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(aX5) — 1 case
In Re Federal Election Campaign Act Litigation (1979) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(aX7)(B) — 1 case
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) nysd “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b) — 1 case
White House Communications Agency Expenses Incurred on Political or Personal Travel by the President (1990) olc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(1)(B) — 1 case
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) ca2
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(l) — 1 case
Green Party of CT v. Garfield (2008) ctd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(l)(A) — 3 cases
John Glenn Presidential Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (1987) cadc
Marion G. Robertson and Americans for Robertson, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (1995) cadc
Kennedy for President Committee and Edward M. Kennedy v. Federal Election Commission (1984) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(l)(B) — 2 cases
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) nysd “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1978) nysd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(c) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
Michael R. Goland v. United States of America, and Federal Election Commission, Intervenor-Appellee (1990) ca9
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (2013) dcd “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2012) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(c)(1)(B) — 1 case
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(c)(l) — 3 cases
United States v. F. Whittemore (2015) ca9
The Freedom Republicans, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (1994) cadc
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) nysd “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d) — 11 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (1999) cod
Republican National Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1980) nysd “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(1) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(2) — 5 cases
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Wertheimer v. Federal Election Commission (2001) cadc
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(2)(3) — 1 case
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(2H3) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(3) — 20 cases
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2001) scotus “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1996) scotus “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Anh Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) ca5 “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(3)(A)(i) — 1 case
Common Cause v. Federal Election Commission (1989) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(3)(B) — 1 case
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1987) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(A) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(A)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(A)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(B) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(S) — 1 case
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee v. Federal Election Commission (1987) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(l) — 5 cases
John B. Anderson v. Federal Election Commission (1980) ca1
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (2000) ca10
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (1995) ca10
Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee (1996) ca10
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(e) — 1 case
Franklin v. Massachusetts (1992) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(f) — 21 cases
Alliance for Democracy v. Federal Election Commission (2005) dcd
FED. ELECTION COM'N v. John A. Dramesi for Congress Committee (1986) njd
Federal Election Commission v. California Medical Ass'n (1980) cand
California Medical Ass'n v. Federal Election Commission (1981) scotus “[1] One such provision, 2 U. S. C. § 441a (a) (1) (C), prohibits individuals and unincorporated associations such as CMA from contributing more than $5,000 per calendar year to any multicandidate political committee such as CALPAC.”
Federal Election Commission v. MacHinists Non-Partisan Political League (1981) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(h) — 9 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Federal Election Commission v. National Republican Senatorial Committee (1992) cadc
Cao v. Federal Election Commission (2010) laed “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union (1999) alaska
Common Cause v. Federal Election Commission (1990) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2008) scotus “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
Davis v. Federal Election Commission (2007) dcd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(B) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(C)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(C)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(C)(iii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(D) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(E) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(B) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(C)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(C)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(C)(iii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(D) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) scotus
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(E) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l) — 2 cases
Catholic Ldrship Coaltn of TX v. David Reis (2014) ca5
Mariani v. United States (1999) pamd
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l)(5) — 1 case
CRG Network v. Barland (2014) wied
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l)(A) — 1 case
Common Cause v. Federal Election Commission (1988) cadc
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l)(C) — 1 case
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003) dcd “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.