2 U.S.C. § 441a

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 2 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 200 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1977–2024 · leading case: McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). · cites it 215× “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001). · cites it 22× “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). · cites it 18× “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
California Med. Ass'n v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 453 U.S. 182 (1981). · cites it 25× “[1] One such provision, 2 U. S. C. § 441a (a) (1) (C), prohibits individuals and unincorporated associations such as CMA from contributing more than $5,000 per calendar year to any multicandidate political committee such as CALPAC.”
Davis v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 554 U.S. 724 (2008). · cites it 10× “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). · cites it 62× “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). · cites it 28× “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). · cites it 17× “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). · cites it 15× “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Speechnow.org v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010). · cites it 6× “Whether the biennial aggregate contribution limit mandated by 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) violates the First Amendment by preventing Fred Young from *691 making contributions to SpeechNow.”
Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 930 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 17× “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
Stop This Insanity Inc Emp. Leadership Fund v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 902 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2012). · cites it 14× “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(1)(A) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(1)(B) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Rufer v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 64 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D.D.C. 2014).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(1)(C) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(2) — 4 cases
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Shrink Missouri Gov't PAC v. Adams, 5 F. Supp. 2d 734 (E.D. Mo. 1998).
Mariani v. United States, 80 F. Supp. 2d 352 (M.D. Penn. 1999).
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 511 F. Supp. 821 (J.P.M.L. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(3)(A) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(5) — 1 case
Toledo Area AFL-CIO Council v. Pizza, 898 F. Supp. 554 (N.D. Ohio 1995).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(7) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(7)(B)(i) — 1 case
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(7)(B)(iii) — 1 case
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(8) — 1 case
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) — 32 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001). “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 414 F.3d 76 (D.C. Cir. 2005).
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1) — 9 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 930 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.D.C. 2013). “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(2) — 1 case
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(A) — 6 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
United States v. O'Donnell, 608 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010).
Green Party of Connecticut v. Garfield, 616 F.3d 213 (2d Cir. 2010).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(B) — 4 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001). “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(C) — 13 cases
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Carey v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 791 F. Supp. 2d 121 (D.D.C. 2011).
Emily's List v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 581 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(1)(D) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2) — 17 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Catholic Ldrship Coaltn of TX v. David Reis, 764 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2014).
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(3) — 1 case
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(A) — 20 cases
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(B) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union, 978 P.2d 597 (Alaska 1999).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(C) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union, 978 P.2d 597 (Alaska 1999).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 681 F.2d 1281 (11th Cir. 1982).
Mott v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 494 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(2)(a) — 2 cases
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 362 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2005).
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 82 F.R.D. 200 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(23) — 1 case
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) — 21 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Speechnow.org v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “Whether the biennial aggregate contribution limit mandated by 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) violates the First Amendment by preventing Fred Young from *691 making contributions to SpeechNow.”
Emily's List v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 581 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
United States v. F. Whittemore, 776 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2015).
Jimmy Yamada v. William Snipes, 786 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2015).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3)(A) — 2 cases
Davis v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 554 U.S. 724 (2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
James v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 914 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2012).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3)(B) — 1 case
Stop This Insanity Inc Emp. Leadership Fund v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 902 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2012). “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(4) — 16 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Catholic Ldrship Coaltn of TX v. David Reis, 764 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2014).
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union, 978 P.2d 597 (Alaska 1999).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(5) — 19 cases
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Malenick, 310 F. Supp. 2d 230 (D.D.C. 2004).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(5)(A) — 1 case
Walther v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 468 F. Supp. 1235 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(6) — 1 case
Riddle v. Hickenlooper, 927 F. Supp. 2d 1092 (D. Colo. 2013).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Shays v. United States Fed. Election Comm'n, 508 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2007).
Clifton v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 927 F. Supp. 493 (D. Me. 1996).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B) — 7 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004).
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Stop This Insanity Inc Emp. Leadership Fund v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 902 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2012). “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Christian Coalition, 52 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 1999).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B)(I) — 3 cases
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 41 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (D. Colo. 1999).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B)(i) — 25 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001). “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Shays v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 337 F. Supp. 2d 28 (D.D.C. 2004).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(B)(ii) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Christian Coalition, 52 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D.D.C. 1999).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(C) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(7)(C)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(8) — 17 cases
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 134 S. Ct. 1434 (2014). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(8). Even the "implicit[ ]" agreement imagined by the District Court, 893 F.”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001). “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
United States v. O'Donnell, 608 F.3d 546 (9th Cir. 2010).
United States v. Danielczyk, 788 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Va. 2011).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(i) — 1 case
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 698 F. Supp. 2d 150 (D.D.C. 2010).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l) — 20 cases
Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 930 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.D.C. 2013). “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
United States v. F. Whittemore, 776 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2015).
United States v. Boender, 649 F.3d 650 (7th Cir. 2011).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(A) — 27 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
United States v. Michael R. Goland, 959 F.2d 1449 (9th Cir. 1992).
United States v. Rowland, 826 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2016).
United States v. F. Whittemore, 776 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2015).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. James Toledano, 317 F.3d 939 (9th Cir. 2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(B) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 930 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.D.C. 2013). “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
Rufer v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 64 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D.D.C. 2014).
John B. Anderson v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 634 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1980).
California Med. Ass'n v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 641 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(C) — 20 cases
Speechnow.org v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 599 F.3d 686 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “Whether the biennial aggregate contribution limit mandated by 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(3) violates the First Amendment by preventing Fred Young from *691 making contributions to SpeechNow.”
Stop This Insanity Inc Emp. Leadership Fund v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 902 F. Supp. 2d 23 (D.D.C. 2012). “Circuit held in SpeechNow that the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) were unconstitutional as applied to contributions made by individuals to a non-connected political committee that made only independent expenditures because “the government can have no anti-corruption…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Emily's List v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 581 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2009).
Repub. Party of New Mexico v. King, 741 F.3d 1089 (10th Cir. 2013).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(D) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Rufer v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 64 F. Supp. 3d 195 (D.D.C. 2014).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a)(l)(c) — 1 case
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Florida for Kennedy Comm., 681 F.2d 1281 (11th Cir. 1982).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(aX2) — 1 case
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1044 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(aX5) — 1 case
In Re Fed. Election Campaign Act Litig., 474 F. Supp. 1044 (D.D.C. 1979).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(aX7)(B) — 1 case
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(1)(B) — 1 case
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 616 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1980).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(l) — 1 case
Green Party of CT v. Garfield, 537 F. Supp. 2d 359 (D. Conn. 2008).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(l)(A) — 3 cases
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(b)(l)(B) — 2 cases
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 461 F. Supp. 570 (S.D.N.Y. 1978).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(c) — 5 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Davis v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 554 U.S. 724 (2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
Libertarian Nat'l Comm., Inc. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 930 F. Supp. 2d 154 (D.D.C. 2013). “3d at 689 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), the questions related to whether the contribution limits in 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) violated the First Amendment as applied to the organization, see id.”
McCutcheon v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 893 F. Supp. 2d 133 (D.D.C. 2012).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(c)(1)(B) — 1 case
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(c)(l) — 3 cases
United States v. F. Whittemore, 776 F.3d 1074 (9th Cir. 2015).
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d) — 11 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 41 F. Supp. 2d 1197 (D. Colo. 1999).
Repub. Nat'l Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 487 F. Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). “2 U.S.C. § 441a(a). Reagan did not pursue political action committee contributions in 1976 because many of these committees were new and lacked funds for presidential campaigns (Black Dep.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(1) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(2) — 5 cases
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
Wertheimer v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 268 F.3d 1070 (D.C. Cir. 2001).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(2)(3) — 1 case
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(2H3) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(3) — 20 cases
Fed. Election Comm'n v. Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. 431 (2001). “The simplicity of the distinction is qualified, however, by the Act's provision for a functional, not formal, definition of "contribution," which includes "expenditures made by any person in cooperation, consultation, or concert, with, or at the request or suggestion of, a…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
Colorado Repub. Fed. Campaign Comm. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 518 U.S. 604 (1996). “We also recognize that FECA permits unregulated "soft money" contributions to a party for certain activities, such as electing candidates for state office, see § 431(8)(A)(i), or for voter registration and "get out the vote" drives, see § 431(8)(B)(xii).”
Anh Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 619 F.3d 410 (5th Cir. 2010). “Since Buckley, § 608(e)(1) has been repealed and replaced with similar provisions in 2 U.S.C. § 441a. 23 Case: 10-30146 Document: 00511230137 Page: 24 Date Filed: 09/10/2010 No.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(3)(A)(i) — 1 case
Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 715 F. Supp. 398 (D.D.C. 1989).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(3)(B) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(A) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(A)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(A)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(4)(B) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(S) — 1 case
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(d)(l) — 5 cases
John B. Anderson v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 634 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1980).
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(e) — 1 case
Franklin v. Massachusetts, 505 U.S. 788 (1992).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(f) — 21 cases
All. for Democracy v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 362 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2005).
Fed. Election Comm'n v. California Med. Ass'n, 502 F. Supp. 196 (N.D. Cal. 1980).
California Med. Ass'n v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 453 U.S. 182 (1981). “[1] One such provision, 2 U. S. C. § 441a (a) (1) (C), prohibits individuals and unincorporated associations such as CMA from contributing more than $5,000 per calendar year to any multicandidate political committee such as CALPAC.”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(h) — 9 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Cao v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 688 F. Supp. 2d 498 (E.D. La. 2010). “2 U.S.C. § 441a: (a) Dollar limits on contributions .”
State v. Alaska Civil Liberties Union, 978 P.2d 597 (Alaska 1999).
Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 729 F. Supp. 148 (D.D.C. 1990).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i) — 3 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Davis v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 554 U.S. 724 (2008). “2 U.S.C. § 441a (2006 ed.). [1] Under the usual circumstances, the same restrictions apply to all the competitors for a seat and their authorized committees.”
Davis v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 501 F. Supp. 2d 22 (D.D.C. 2007).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(B) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(C)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(C)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(C)(iii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(D) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(1)(E) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(B) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(C)(i) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(C)(ii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(C)(iii) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(D) — 2 cases
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 540 U.S. 93 (2003).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(i)(l)(E) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l) — 2 cases
Catholic Ldrship Coaltn of TX v. David Reis, 764 F.3d 409 (5th Cir. 2014).
Mariani v. United States, 80 F. Supp. 2d 352 (M.D. Penn. 1999).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l)(5) — 1 case
CRG Network v. Barland, 48 F. Supp. 3d 1191 (E.D. Wis. 2014).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l)(A) — 1 case
Common Cause v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 842 F.2d 436 (D.C. Cir. 1988).
— 2 U.S.C. § 441a(l)(C) — 1 case
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, 251 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D.D.C. 2003). “" BCRA § 214(c); 2 U.S.C. § 441a note. Congress also instructed that the regulations should address (1) payments for the republication of campaign materials; (2) payments for the use of a common vendor; (3) payments for communications directed or made by persons who previously…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.