20 U.S.C. § 401
SENSE OF CONGRESS.
“It is the sense of the Congress that a recipient (including a nation, individual, group, or organization) of any form of subsidy, aid, or other Federal assistance under the Acts amended by this Act [probably means this section, see Short Title of 1990 Amendment note above] should, in expending that assistance, purchase American-made equipment and products.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1963–2022 · leading case: Marshall Jt. Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. C.D. Ex Rel. Brian & Traci D., 616 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2010).
Marshall Jt. Sch. Dist. No. 2 v. C.D. Ex Rel. Brian & Traci D., 616 F.3d 632 (7th Cir. 2010). “20 U.S.C. § 401 (3)(A)(ii) (the second step in the analysis is whether the child "needs special education and related services.”
Bd. of Regents of Univ. of Wisconsin Sys. v. Mussallem, 289 N.W.2d 801 (Wis. 1980). “” 6 See: National Defense Education Act of 1958, 20 U.S.C.S. §401 et seq. 7 This court recognizes that the Act does apply to some educational type services, as provided in sec.”
Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401 (D.D.C. 1967). “, the National Defense Education Act of 1958, 20 U.S.C. § 401 et seq.), and even from a strained reading of a phrase in Brown v.”
Marjorie Webster Junior Coll., Inc., a Corp. v. Middle States Ass'n of Colleges & Secondardy Schs., Inc., a Corp., 432 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1970). “§ 402: “Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed to authorize any department, agency, officer, or employee of the United States to exercise any direction, supervision, or control over the curriculum, program of instruction, administration, or personnel of any educational…”
Bd. of Trs. v. Bruce (In Re Bruce), 3 B.R. 77 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1980). “20 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. There were also direct loans, similar in most respects, under Part E of Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965.”
Corchado Ex Rel. Corchado v. Bd. of Educ., 86 F. Supp. 2d 168 (W.D.N.Y. 2000). “Given the broad scope of the legislation, it is not surprising that the Act as well as its implementing regulations take an inclusionary approach in defining the term “child with a disability” and embrace within its scope children who suffer from a wide variety of deficits…”
State of Louisiana v. Weinberger, 369 F. Supp. 856 (E.D. La. 1973). “(hereafter LSCA) and the National Defense Education Act of 1958, 20 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (hereafter NDEA).”
M.C. Ex Rel. C. v. Voluntown Bd. of Educ., 56 F. Supp. 2d 243 (D. Conn. 1999). “See 20 U.S.C. § 401 (a)(18)(D). Thus, there was no legal basis for the Board to insist that The Rectory School contractually agree to comply with the IDEA’S requirements relating to IEPs.”
Corr v. Mattheis, 407 F. Supp. 847 (D.R.I. 1976). “See also 20 U.S.C. § 401 , quoted in note 6, supra.”
Griffin v. Bd. of Supervisors of Prince Edward Cnty., 322 F.2d 332 (4th Cir. 1963). “The more the United States asserts that Virginia’s Constitution places affirmative, but neglected duties upon Virginia’s General Assembly and State Board of Education, the closer it skirts the Eleventh Amendment’s prohibition against suits in the courts of the United States by…”
Doe v. Knox Cnty., Tennessee (E.D. Tenn. 2022). “Further, “special education” is “specially designed instruction, at no cost to the parents, to meet the unique needs of a child with a disability,” 20 U.S.C. § 401 (29), including “adapting, as appropriate .”
M.B. v. Lee (jrg1) (E.D. Tenn. 2021). “], so in his view, “the crux of their complaint is that they are being denied” a free public education and, therefore, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., governs their claims, [id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.