20 U.S.C. § 6301
Statement of purpose
The purpose of this subchapter is to provide all children significant opportunity to receive a fair, equitable, and high-quality education, and to close educational achievement gaps.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 118
cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Sch. Dist. of City of Pontiac v. Sec'y of US Dep't of Educ., 584 F.3d 253 (6th Cir. 2009).
Sch. Dist. of City of Pontiac v. Sec'y of US Dep't of Educ., 584 F.3d 253 (6th Cir. 2009). “" 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2). In addition to Title I, Part A, NCLB establishes numerous other programs, including a literacy initiative for young children and poor families (Title I, Part B), special services for the education of children of migrant workers (Title I, Part C),…”
Connecticut Coalition for Just. in Educ. Funding, Inc. v. Rell, 990 A.2d 206 (Conn. 2010). “[8] As evidence of the state's failure to provide "suitable educational opportunities," the plaintiffs further rely on educational "outputs" from the previously discussed schools, as measured by the "adequate yearly progress" on student achievement tests required under the…”
Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (1997). “27 , as modified, 20 U. S. C. § 6301 et seq., to "provid[e] full educational opportunity to every child regardless of economic background.”
The Ctr. for Law & Educ. v. Dep't of Educ., 396 F.3d 1152 (D.C. Cir. 2005). “1425, codified at 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. The Act requires each State to implement statewide accountability systems for all public schools and their students, to define éducation standards, and to establish a system of assessments for measuring whether students have met those…”
Connecticut v. Spellings, 453 F. Supp. 2d 459 (D. Conn. 2006). “” 20 U.S.C. § 6301 . Academic ae- *469 countability lies at the core of the Act, which seeks to improve educational attainment by ensuring that “high quality academic assessments, accountability systems, teacher preparation and training, curriculum, and instructional materials…”
Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State, 801 N.E.2d 326 (NY 2003). “Starting at the federal level, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub L 107-110, 115 US Stat 1425 [2002]), amending the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 ( 20 USC § 6301 et seq. ), now requires states to establish mechanisms to identify schools where student…”
Grammer v. John J. Kane Reg'l Centers-Glen Hazel, 570 F.3d 520 (3rd Cir. 2009). “was neutralized by the overall structure of the No Child Left Behind Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq. 547 F.3d at 211-12 .”
Sch. Dist. v. Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Educ., 512 F.3d 252 (6th Cir. 2008). “" 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (2). In addition to Title I, Part A, NCLB establishes numerous other programs, including a literacy initiative for young children and poor families (Title I, Part B); special services for the education of children of migrant workers (Title I, Part C);…”
Coachella Valley Unified Sch. Dist. v. State of California, 176 Cal. App. 4th 93 (Cal. Ct. App. 2009). “California participates in the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLBA) ( 20 U.S.C. § 6301 et seq.) and includes in its assessment program for purposes of NCLBA accountability most of the nearly 1.”
Sonya Renee v. Arne Duncan, 686 F.3d 1002 (9th Cir. 2012). “” 20 U.S.C. § 6301 . NCLB seeks to close the “achievement gap between high- and low-performing chil- dren, especially the achievement gaps between minority and nonminority students, and between disadvantaged children and their more advantaged peers.”
Hancock v. Comm'r of Educ., 443 Mass. 428 (Mass. 2005). “1425 , principally codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 6301 et seq.], however, requires students in each school and district to achieve proficiency (as measured by the MCAS tests) by 2014, and also requires that each State have a single, unified system of accountability for both Federal…”
P.P. Ex Rel. Michael P. v. West Chester Area Sch. Dist., 585 F.3d 727 (3rd Cir. 2009). “Title I is designed to help students reach state academic achievement levels; private school students are guaranteed these services under 20 U.S.C. § 6301 . Rita P. claims that in early 2003 she contacted Carol Gaspar, the St.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.